<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Immigration Law Journal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress.com weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 06 Nov 2011 22:07:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
<cloud domain='theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/osd.xml" title="The Immigration Law Journal" />
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
		<title>Visa Bulletin For November 2011</title>
		<link>http://theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/2011/11/06/visa-bulletin-for-november-2011/</link>
		<comments>http://theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/2011/11/06/visa-bulletin-for-november-2011/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Nov 2011 22:07:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>theimmigrationlawjournal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Employment Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Cards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage Green Cards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Immigration Law Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Visa Bulletin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Work Visas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/?p=363</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Number 38
Volume IX
Washington, D.C.

    View as Printer Friendly PDF

A. STATUTORY NUMBERS

1. This bulletin summarizes the availability of immigrant numbers during November. Consular officers are required to report to the Department of State documentarily qualified applicants for numerically limited visas; U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services in the Department of Homeland Security reports applicants for adjustment of status. Allocations were made, to the extent possible, in chronological order of reported priority dates, for demand received by October 5th. If not all demand could be satisfied, the category or foreign state in which demand was excessive was deemed oversubscribed. The cut-off date for an oversubscribed category is the priority date of the first applicant who could not be reached within the numerical limits. Only applicants who have a priority date earlier than the cut-off date may be allotted a number. If it becomes necessary during the monthly allocation process to retrogress a cut-off date, supplemental requests for numbers will be honored only if the priority date falls within the new cut-off date announced in this bulletin.

2. Section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) sets an annual minimum family-sponsored preference limit of 226,000. The worldwide level for annual employment-based preference immigrants is at least 140,000. Section 202 prescribes that the per-country limit for preference immigrants is set at 7% of the total annual family-sponsored and employment-based preference limits, i.e., 25,620. The dependent area limit is set at 2%, or 7,320.

3. INA Section 203(e) provides that family-sponsored and employment-based preference visas be issued to eligible immigrants in the order in which a petition in behalf of each has been filed. Section 203(d) provides that spouses and children of preference immigrants are entitled to the same status, and the same order of consideration, if accompanying or following to join the principal. The visa prorating provisions of Section 202(e) apply to allocations for a foreign state or dependent area when visa demand exceeds the per-country limit. These provisions apply at present to the following oversubscribed chargeability areas: CHINA-mainland born, INDIA, MEXICO, and PHILIPPINES.<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com&amp;blog=6520816&amp;post=363&amp;subd=theimmigrationlawjournal&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Number 38<br /> Volume IX<br /> Washington, D.C.</em></p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://travel.state.gov/pdf/visabulletin/visabulletin_Nov2011.pdf">View as Printer Friendly PDF</a></li>
</ul>
<p><strong>A. STATUTORY NUMBERS</strong></p>
<p>1. This bulletin summarizes the availability of immigrant numbers during <strong>November</strong>. Consular officers are required to report to the Department of State documentarily qualified applicants for numerically limited visas; U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services in the Department of Homeland Security reports applicants for adjustment of status. Allocations were made, to the extent possible, in chronological order of reported priority dates, for demand received by October <strong>5th</strong>. If not all demand could be satisfied, the category or foreign state in which demand was excessive was deemed oversubscribed. The cut-off date for an oversubscribed category is the priority date of the first applicant who could not be reached within the numerical limits. Only applicants who have a priority date <strong>earlier than</strong> the cut-off date may be allotted a number. If it becomes necessary during the monthly allocation process to retrogress a cut-off date, supplemental requests for numbers will be honored only if the priority date falls within the new cut-off date announced in this bulletin.</p>
<p>2. Section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) sets an annual minimum family-sponsored preference limit of 226,000. The worldwide level for annual employment-based preference immigrants is at least 140,000. Section 202 prescribes that the per-country limit for preference immigrants is set at 7% of the total annual family-sponsored and employment-based preference limits, i.e., 25,620. The dependent area limit is set at 2%, or 7,320.</p>
<p>3. INA Section 203(e) provides that family-sponsored and employment-based preference visas be issued to eligible immigrants in the order in which a petition in behalf of each has been filed. Section 203(d) provides that spouses and children of preference immigrants are entitled to the same status, and the same order of consideration, if accompanying or following to join the principal. The visa prorating provisions of Section 202(e) apply to allocations for a foreign state or dependent area when visa demand exceeds the per-country limit. These provisions apply at present to the following oversubscribed chargeability areas: CHINA-mainland born, INDIA, MEXICO, and PHILIPPINES.</p>
<p>4. Section 203(a) of the INA prescribes preference classes for allotment of Family-sponsored immigrant visas as follows:</p>
<p><strong>FAMILY-SPONSORED PREFERENCES</strong></p>
<p><strong>First:</strong>(<strong>F1</strong>) Unmarried Sons and Daughters of U.S. Citizens: 23,400 plus any numbers not required for fourth preference.</p>
<p><strong>Second:</strong> Spouses and Children, and Unmarried Sons and Daughters of Permanent Residents: 114,200, plus the number (if any) by which the worldwide family preference level exceeds 226,000, plus any unused first preference numbers:</p>
<p>A. (<strong>F2A</strong>) Spouses and Children of Permanent Residents: 77% of the overall second preference limitation, of which 75% are exempt from the per-country limit;</p>
<p>B. (<strong>F2B</strong>) Unmarried Sons and Daughters (21 years of age or older) of Permanent Residents: 23% of the overall second preference limitation.</p>
<p><strong>Third:</strong>(<strong>F3</strong>) Married Sons and Daughters of U.S. Citizens: 23,400, plus any numbers not required by first and second preferences.</p>
<p><strong>Fourth:</strong>(<strong>F4</strong>) Brothers and Sisters of Adult U.S. Citizens: 65,000, plus any numbers not required by first three preferences.</p>
<p>On the chart below, the listing of a date for any class indicates that the class is oversubscribed (see paragraph 1); &#8220;C&#8221; means current, i.e., numbers are available for all qualified applicants; and &#8220;U&#8221; means unavailable, i.e., no numbers are available. (NOTE: Numbers are available only for applicants whose priority date is <strong>earlier</strong> than the cut-off date listed below.)</p>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="85"><strong>Family- Sponsored</strong></td>
<td width="104"><strong>All Chargeability Areas Except Those Listed</strong></td>
<td width="136"><strong>CHINA- mainland born</strong></td>
<td width="136"><strong>INDIA</strong></td>
<td width="136"><strong>MEXICO</strong></td>
<td width="136"><strong>PHILIPPINES</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="85"><strong>F1</strong></td>
<td width="104">22JUL04</td>
<td width="136">22JUL04</td>
<td width="136">22JUL04</td>
<td width="136">01APR93</td>
<td width="136">08FEB97</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="85"><strong>F2A *</strong></td>
<td width="104">15FEB09</td>
<td width="136">15FEB09</td>
<td width="136">15FEB09</td>
<td width="136">01DEC08</td>
<td width="136">15FEB09</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="85"><strong>F2B</strong></td>
<td width="104">01AUG03</td>
<td width="136">01AUG03</td>
<td width="136">01AUG03</td>
<td width="136">22NOV92</td>
<td width="136">15JUL01</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="85"><strong>F3</strong></td>
<td width="104">22SEP01</td>
<td width="136">22SEP01</td>
<td width="136">22SEP01</td>
<td width="136">08DEC92</td>
<td width="136">22JUN92</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="85"><strong>F4</strong></td>
<td width="104">15JUN00</td>
<td width="136">15JUN00</td>
<td width="136">15JUN00</td>
<td width="136">22APR96</td>
<td width="136">22AUG88</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>*NOTE: For November, F2A numbers <strong>EXEMPT from per-country limit</strong> are available to applicants from all countries with priority dates <strong>earlier</strong> than 01DEC08. F2A numbers <strong>SUBJECT to per-country limit</strong> are available to applicants chargeable to all countries <strong>EXCEPT MEXICO</strong> with priority dates beginning 01DEC08 and earlier than 15FEB09. (All F2A numbers provided for MEXICO are exempt from the per-country limit; there are no F2A numbers for MEXICO subject to per-country limit.)</p>
<p>5. Section 203(b) of the INA prescribes preference classes for allotment of Employment-based immigrant visas as follows:</p>
<p><strong>EMPLOYMENT-BASED PREFERENCES</strong></p>
<p><strong>First:</strong> Priority Workers: 28.6% of the worldwide employment-based preference level, plus any numbers not required for fourth and fifth preferences.</p>
<p><strong>Second:</strong> Members of the Professions Holding Advanced Degrees or Persons of Exceptional Ability: 28.6% of the worldwide employment-based preference level, plus any numbers not required by first preference.</p>
<p><strong>Third:</strong> Skilled Workers, Professionals, and Other Workers: 28.6% of the worldwide level, plus any numbers not required by first and second preferences, not more than 10,000 of which to &#8220;*Other Workers&#8221;.</p>
<p><strong>Fourth:</strong> Certain Special Immigrants: 7.1% of the worldwide level.</p>
<p><strong>Fifth:</strong> Employment Creation: 7.1% of the worldwide level, not less than 3,000 of which reserved for investors in a targeted rural or high-unemployment area, and 3,000 set aside for investors in regional centers by Sec. 610 of Pub. L. 102-395.</p>
<p>On the chart below, the listing of a date for any class indicates that the class is oversubscribed (see paragraph 1); &#8220;C&#8221; means current, i.e., numbers are available for all qualified applicants; and &#8220;U&#8221; means unavailable, i.e., no numbers are available. (NOTE: Numbers are available only for applicants whose priority date is <strong>earlier</strong> than the cut-off date listed below.)</p>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="171"><strong>Employment- Based</strong></td>
<td width="104"><strong>All Charge-ability Areas Except Those Listed</strong></td>
<td width="97"><strong>CHINA- mainland born</strong></td>
<td width="97"><strong>INDIA</strong></td>
<td width="97"><strong>MEXICO</strong></td>
<td width="119"><strong>PHILIPPINES</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="171"><strong>1st</strong></td>
<td width="104"> C</td>
<td width="97">C</td>
<td width="97">C</td>
<td width="97">C</td>
<td width="119">C</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="171"><strong>2nd</strong></td>
<td width="104"> C</td>
<td width="97">01NOV07</td>
<td width="97">01NOV07</td>
<td width="97">C</td>
<td width="119">C</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="171"><strong>3rd</strong></td>
<td width="104">22DEC05</td>
<td width="97">22AUG04</td>
<td width="97">22JUL02</td>
<td width="97">22DEC05</td>
<td width="119">22DEC05</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="171"><strong>Other Workers*</strong></td>
<td width="104">15NOV05</td>
<td width="97">22APR03</td>
<td width="97">15JUN02</td>
<td width="97">15NOV05</td>
<td width="119">15NOV05</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="171"><strong>4th</strong></td>
<td width="104">C</td>
<td width="97">C</td>
<td width="97">C</td>
<td width="97">C</td>
<td width="119">C</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="171"><strong>Certain Religious Workers</strong></td>
<td width="104">C</td>
<td width="97">C</td>
<td width="97">C</td>
<td width="97">C</td>
<td width="119">C</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="171"><strong>5th<br />
Targeted Employment Areas/</strong><strong>Regional Centers</strong> <strong>and Pilot Programs</strong></td>
<td width="104">C</td>
<td width="97">C</td>
<td width="97">C</td>
<td width="97">C</td>
<td width="119">C</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>*Employment Third Preference Other Workers Category: Section 203(e) of the Nicaraguan and Central American Relief Act (NACARA) passed by Congress in November 1997, as amended by Section 1(e) of Pub. L. 105-139, provides that once the Employment Third Preference Other Worker (EW) cut-off date has reached the priority date of the latest EW petition approved prior to November 19, 1997, the 10,000 EW numbers available for a fiscal year are to be reduced by up to 5,000 annually beginning in the following fiscal year. This reduction is to be made for as long as necessary to offset adjustments under the NACARA program. Since the EW cut-off date reached November 19, 1997 during Fiscal Year 2001, the reduction in the EW annual limit to 5,000 began in Fiscal Year 2002.</p>
<p>6. The Department of State has a recorded message with visa availability information which can be heard at: (202) 663-1541. This recording is updated on or about the tenth of each month with information on cut-off dates for the following month.</p>
<p><strong>B. DIVERSITY IMMIGRANT (DV) CATEGORY</strong></p>
<p>Section 203(c) of the INA provides up to 55,000 immigrant visas each fiscal year to permit additional immigration opportunities for persons from countries with low admissions during the previous five years. The NACARA stipulates that beginning with DV-99, and for as long as necessary, up to 5,000 of the 55,000 annually-allocated diversity visas will be made available for use under the NACARA program. <strong>This resulted in reduction of the DV-2012 annual limit to 50,000</strong>. DV visas are divided among six geographic regions. No one country can receive more than seven percent of the available diversity visas in any one year.</p>
<p>For <strong>November</strong>, immigrant numbers in the DV category are available to qualified DV-2012 applicants chargeable to all regions/eligible countries as follows. When an allocation cut-off number is shown, visas are available only for applicants with DV regional lottery rank numbers <strong>BELOW</strong> the specified allocation cut-off number:</p>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="244"><strong>Region </strong></td>
<td width="244"><strong>All DV Chargeability Areas Except Those Listed Separately</strong></td>
<td width="244"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="244"><strong>AFRICA</strong></td>
<td width="244">13,000</td>
<td width="244">Except: Egypt 8,000<br />
Ethiopia 10,000<br />
Nigeria 10,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="244"><strong>ASIA</strong></td>
<td width="244">10,000</td>
<td width="244"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="244"><strong>EUROPE</strong></td>
<td width="244">11,000</td>
<td width="244"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="244"><strong>NORTH AMERICA<br />
(BAHAMAS)</strong></td>
<td width="244">4</td>
<td width="244"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="244"><strong>OCEANIA</strong></td>
<td width="244">500</td>
<td width="244"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="244"><strong>SOUTH AMERICA,<br />
and the CARIBBEAN</strong></td>
<td width="244">550</td>
<td width="244"></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Entitlement to immigrant status in the DV category lasts only through the end of the fiscal (visa) year for which the applicant is selected in the lottery. The year of entitlement for all applicants registered for the DV-2012 program ends as of September 30, 2012. DV visas may not be issued to DV-2012 applicants after that date. Similarly, spouses and children accompanying or following to join DV-2012 principals are only entitled to derivative DV status until September 30, 2012. DV visa availability through the very end of FY-2012 cannot be taken for granted. Numbers could be exhausted prior to September 30.</p>
<p><strong>C. ADVANCE NOTIFICATION OF THE DIVERSITY (DV) IMMIGRANT CATEGORY RANK CUT-OFFS WHICH WILL APPLY IN DECEMBER</p>
<p></strong>For <strong>December</strong>, immigrant numbers in the DV category are available to qualified DV-2012 applicants chargeable to all regions/eligible countries as follows. When an allocation cut-off number is shown, visas are available only for applicants with DV regional lottery rank numbers <strong>BELOW</strong> the specified allocation cut-off number:</p>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="244"><strong>Region</strong></td>
<td width="244"><strong>All DV Chargeability Areas Except Those Listed Separately</strong></td>
<td width="244"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="244"><strong>AFRICA</strong></td>
<td width="244">18,500</td>
<td width="244">Except:<br />
Egypt 12,700<br />
Ethiopia 13,500<br />
Nigeria 12,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="244"><strong>ASIA</strong></td>
<td width="244">15,000</td>
<td width="244"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="244"><strong>EUROPE</strong></td>
<td width="244">13,500</td>
<td width="244"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="244"><strong>NORTH AMERICA<br />
(BAHAMAS)</strong></td>
<td width="244">5</td>
<td width="244"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="244"><strong>OCEANIA</strong></td>
<td width="244">575</td>
<td width="244"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="244"><strong>SOUTH AMERICA,<br />
</strong><strong>and the CARIBBEAN</strong></td>
<td width="244">600</td>
<td width="244"></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><strong>D.</strong> <strong>CHINA-MAINLAND BORN AND INDIA EMPLOYMENT-BASED SECOND PREFERENCE VISA AVAILABILITY IN THE COMING MONTHS</strong></p>
<p>The November Employment-based Second preference cut-off date for applicants from China and India is the most favorable since August 2007.  This advancement is expected to generate significant levels of demand based on new filings for adjustment of status at U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services offices.  While significant future cut-off date movements are anticipated, they may not be made on a monthly basis.  Readers should not expect such movements to be the norm throughout the fiscal year, and an eventual retrogression of the cut-off at some point during the year is a distinct possibility.</p>
<br />  <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gocomments/theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/363/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/comments/theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/363/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godelicious/theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/363/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/delicious/theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/363/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gofacebook/theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/363/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/facebook/theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/363/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gotwitter/theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/363/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/twitter/theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/363/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gostumble/theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/363/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/stumble/theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/363/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godigg/theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/363/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/digg/theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/363/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/goreddit/theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/363/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/reddit/theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/363/" /></a> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com&amp;blog=6520816&amp;post=363&amp;subd=theimmigrationlawjournal&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/2011/11/06/visa-bulletin-for-november-2011/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/7489bcbd1141f62e3971d4d095a39545?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">theimmigrationlawjournal</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Visa Bulletin For October 2011</title>
		<link>http://theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/2011/11/06/visa-bulletin-for-october-2011/</link>
		<comments>http://theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/2011/11/06/visa-bulletin-for-october-2011/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Nov 2011 22:04:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>theimmigrationlawjournal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Diversity Visa Lottery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Cards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage Green Cards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Immigration Law Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Visa Bulletin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Work Visas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/?p=355</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Number 37
Volume IX
Washington, D.C.

View as Printer Friendly PDF

A. STATUTORY NUMBERS

1. This bulletin summarizes the availability of immigrant numbers during October. Consular officers are required to report to the Department of State documentarily qualified applicants for numerically limited visas; U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services in the Department of Homeland Security reports applicants for adjustment of status. Allocations were made, to the extent possible, in chronological order of reported priority dates, for demand received by September 9th. If not all demand could be satisfied, the category or foreign state in which demand was excessive was deemed oversubscribed. The cut-off date for an oversubscribed category is the priority date of the first applicant who could not be reached within the numerical limits. Only applicants who have a priority date earlier than the cut-off date may be allotted a number. If it becomes necessary during the monthly allocation process to retrogress a cut-off date, supplemental requests for numbers will be honored only if the priority date falls within the new cut-off date announced in this bulletin.

2. Section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) sets an annual minimum family-sponsored preference limit of 226,000. The worldwide level for annual employment-based preference immigrants is at least 140,000. Section 202 prescribes that the per-country limit for preference immigrants is set at 7% of the total annual family-sponsored and employment-based preference limits, i.e., 25,620. The dependent area limit is set at 2%, or 7,320.

3. INA Section 203(e) provides that family-sponsored and employment-based preference visas be issued to eligible immigrants in the order in which a petition in behalf of each has been filed. Section 203(d) provides that spouses and children of preference immigrants are entitled to the same status, and the same order of consideration, if accompanying or following to join the principal. The visa prorating provisions of Section 202(e) apply to allocations for a foreign state or dependent area when visa demand exceeds the per-country limit. These provisions apply at present to the following oversubscribed chargeability areas: CHINA-mainland born, INDIA, MEXICO, and PHILIPPINES.

4. Section 203(a) of the INA prescribes preference classes for allotment of Family-sponsored immigrant visas as follows:

FAMILY-SPONSORED PREFERENCES

First:(F1) Unmarried Sons and Daughters of U.S. Citizens: 23,400 plus any numbers not required for fourth preference.

Second: Spouses and Children, and Unmarried Sons and Daughters of Permanent Residents: 114,200, plus the number (if any) by which the worldwide family preference level exceeds 226,000, plus any unused first preference numbers:<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com&amp;blog=6520816&amp;post=355&amp;subd=theimmigrationlawjournal&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Number 37<br />
Volume IX<br />
Washington, D.C.</p>
<p>View as Printer Friendly PDF</p>
<p>A. STATUTORY NUMBERS</p>
<p>1. This bulletin summarizes the availability of immigrant numbers during October. Consular officers are required to report to the Department of State documentarily qualified applicants for numerically limited visas; U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services in the Department of Homeland Security reports applicants for adjustment of status. Allocations were made, to the extent possible, in chronological order of reported priority dates, for demand received by September 9th. If not all demand could be satisfied, the category or foreign state in which demand was excessive was deemed oversubscribed. The cut-off date for an oversubscribed category is the priority date of the first applicant who could not be reached within the numerical limits. Only applicants who have a priority date earlier than the cut-off date may be allotted a number. If it becomes necessary during the monthly allocation process to retrogress a cut-off date, supplemental requests for numbers will be honored only if the priority date falls within the new cut-off date announced in this bulletin.</p>
<p>2. Section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) sets an annual minimum family-sponsored preference limit of 226,000. The worldwide level for annual employment-based preference immigrants is at least 140,000. Section 202 prescribes that the per-country limit for preference immigrants is set at 7% of the total annual family-sponsored and employment-based preference limits, i.e., 25,620. The dependent area limit is set at 2%, or 7,320.</p>
<p>3. INA Section 203(e) provides that family-sponsored and employment-based preference visas be issued to eligible immigrants in the order in which a petition in behalf of each has been filed. Section 203(d) provides that spouses and children of preference immigrants are entitled to the same status, and the same order of consideration, if accompanying or following to join the principal. The visa prorating provisions of Section 202(e) apply to allocations for a foreign state or dependent area when visa demand exceeds the per-country limit. These provisions apply at present to the following oversubscribed chargeability areas: CHINA-mainland born, INDIA, MEXICO, and PHILIPPINES.</p>
<p>4. Section 203(a) of the INA prescribes preference classes for allotment of Family-sponsored immigrant visas as follows:</p>
<p>FAMILY-SPONSORED PREFERENCES</p>
<p>First:(F1) Unmarried Sons and Daughters of U.S. Citizens: 23,400 plus any numbers not required for fourth preference.</p>
<p>Second: Spouses and Children, and Unmarried Sons and Daughters of Permanent Residents: 114,200, plus the number (if any) by which the worldwide family preference level exceeds 226,000, plus any unused first preference numbers:</p>
<p>A. (F2A) Spouses and Children of Permanent Residents: 77% of the overall second preference limitation, of which 75% are exempt from the per-country limit;</p>
<p>B. (F2B) Unmarried Sons and Daughters (21 years of age or older) of Permanent Residents: 23% of the overall second preference limitation.</p>
<p>Third:(F3) Married Sons and Daughters of U.S. Citizens: 23,400, plus any numbers not required by first and second preferences.</p>
<p>Fourth:(F4) Brothers and Sisters of Adult U.S. Citizens: 65,000, plus any numbers not required by first three preferences.</p>
<p>On the chart below, the listing of a date for any class indicates that the class is oversubscribed (see paragraph 1); &#8220;C&#8221; means current, i.e., numbers are available for all qualified applicants; and &#8220;U&#8221; means unavailable, i.e., no numbers are available. (NOTE: Numbers are available only for applicants whose priority date is earlier than the cut-off date listed below.)</p>
<p>Family- Sponsored</p>
<p>All Chargeability Areas Except Those Listed</p>
<p>CHINA- mainland born</p>
<p>INDIA</p>
<p>MEXICO</p>
<p>PHILIPPINES</p>
<p>F1</p>
<p>15JUN04</p>
<p>15JUN04</p>
<p>15JUN04</p>
<p>22MAR93</p>
<p>08JAN97</p>
<p>F2A *</p>
<p>08JAN09</p>
<p>08JAN09</p>
<p>08JAN09</p>
<p>15OCT08</p>
<p>08JAN09</p>
<p>F2B</p>
<p>15JUL03</p>
<p>15JUL03</p>
<p>15JUL03</p>
<p>22NOV92</p>
<p>01MAY01</p>
<p>F3</p>
<p>08SEP01</p>
<p>08SEP01</p>
<p>08SEP01</p>
<p>01DEC92</p>
<p>08JUN92</p>
<p>F4</p>
<p>15MAY00</p>
<p>15MAY00</p>
<p>15MAY00</p>
<p>08APR96</p>
<p>01AUG88</p>
<p>*NOTE: For October, F2A numbers EXEMPT from per-country limit are available to applicants from all countries with priority dates earlier than 15OCT08. F2A numbers SUBJECT to per-country limit are available to applicants chargeable to all countries EXCEPT MEXICO with priority dates beginning 15OCT08 and earlier than 08JAN09. (All F2A numbers provided for MEXICO are exempt from the per-country limit; there are no F2A numbers for MEXICO subject to per-country limit.)</p>
<p>5. Section 203(b) of the INA prescribes preference classes for allotment of Employment-based immigrant visas as follows:</p>
<p>EMPLOYMENT-BASED PREFERENCES</p>
<p>First: Priority Workers: 28.6% of the worldwide employment-based preference level, plus any numbers not required for fourth and fifth preferences.</p>
<p>Second: Members of the Professions Holding Advanced Degrees or Persons of Exceptional Ability: 28.6% of the worldwide employment-based preference level, plus any numbers not required by first preference.</p>
<p>Third: Skilled Workers, Professionals, and Other Workers: 28.6% of the worldwide level, plus any numbers not required by first and second preferences, not more than 10,000 of which to &#8220;*Other Workers&#8221;.</p>
<p>Fourth: Certain Special Immigrants: 7.1% of the worldwide level.</p>
<p>Fifth: Employment Creation: 7.1% of the worldwide level, not less than 3,000 of which reserved for investors in a targeted rural or high-unemployment area, and 3,000 set aside for investors in regional centers by Sec. 610 of Pub. L. 102-395.</p>
<p>On the chart below, the listing of a date for any class indicates that the class is oversubscribed (see paragraph 1); &#8220;C&#8221; means current, i.e., numbers are available for all qualified applicants; and &#8220;U&#8221; means unavailable, i.e., no numbers are available. (NOTE: Numbers are available only for applicants whose priority date is earlier than the cut-off date listed below.)</p>
<p>Employment- Based</p>
<p>All Charge-ability Areas Except Those Listed</p>
<p>CHINA- mainland born</p>
<p>INDIA</p>
<p>MEXICO</p>
<p>PHILIPPINES</p>
<p>1st</p>
<p>C</p>
<p>C</p>
<p>C</p>
<p>C</p>
<p>C</p>
<p>2nd</p>
<p>C</p>
<p>15JUL07</p>
<p>15JUL07</p>
<p>C</p>
<p>C</p>
<p>3rd</p>
<p>08DEC05</p>
<p>08AUG04</p>
<p>15JUL02</p>
<p>08DEC05</p>
<p>08DEC05</p>
<p>Other Workers*</p>
<p>15SEP05</p>
<p>22APR03</p>
<p>08JUN02</p>
<p>15SEP05</p>
<p>15SEP05</p>
<p>4th</p>
<p>C</p>
<p>C</p>
<p>C</p>
<p>C</p>
<p>C</p>
<p>Certain Religious Workers</p>
<p>C</p>
<p>C</p>
<p>C</p>
<p>C</p>
<p>C</p>
<p>5th<br />
Targeted Employment Areas/Regional Centers and Pilot Programs</p>
<p>C</p>
<p>C</p>
<p>C</p>
<p>C</p>
<p>C</p>
<p>*Employment Third Preference Other Workers Category: Section 203(e) of the Nicaraguan and Central American Relief Act (NACARA) passed by Congress in November 1997, as amended by Section 1(e) of Pub. L. 105-139, provides that once the Employment Third Preference Other Worker (EW) cut-off date has reached the priority date of the latest EW petition approved prior to November 19, 1997, the 10,000 EW numbers available for a fiscal year are to be reduced by up to 5,000 annually beginning in the following fiscal year. This reduction is to be made for as long as necessary to offset adjustments under the NACARA program. Since the EW cut-off date reached November 19, 1997 during Fiscal Year 2001, the reduction in the EW annual limit to 5,000 began in Fiscal Year 2002.</p>
<p>6. The Department of State has a recorded message with visa availability information which can be heard at: (202) 663-1541. This recording is updated on or about the tenth of each month with information on cut-off dates for the following month.</p>
<p>B. DIVERSITY IMMIGRANT (DV) CATEGORY</p>
<p>Section 203(c) of the INA provides up to 55,000 immigrant visas each fiscal year to permit additional immigration opportunities for persons from countries with low admissions during the previous five years. The NACARA stipulates that beginning with DV-99, and for as long as necessary, up to 5,000 of the 55,000 annually-allocated diversity visas will be made available for use under the NACARA program. This resulted in reduction of the DV-2012 annual limit to 50,000. DV visas are divided among six geographic regions. No one country can receive more than seven percent of the available diversity visas in any one year.</p>
<p>For October, immigrant numbers in the DV category are available to qualified DV-2012 applicants chargeable to all regions/eligible countries as follows. When an allocation cut-off number is shown, visas are available only for applicants with DV regional lottery rank numbers BELOW the specified allocation cut-off number:</p>
<p>Region</p>
<p>All DV Chargeability Areas Except Those Listed Separately</p>
<p>AFRICA</p>
<p>8,500</p>
<p>Except: Egypt 5,000<br />
Ethiopia 7,000<br />
Nigeria 7,000</p>
<p>ASIA</p>
<p>8,000</p>
<p>EUROPE</p>
<p>8,500</p>
<p>NORTH AMERICA<br />
(BAHAMAS)</p>
<p>3</p>
<p>OCEANIA</p>
<p>300</p>
<p>SOUTH AMERICA,<br />
and the CARIBBEAN</p>
<p>400</p>
<p>Entitlement to immigrant status in the DV category lasts only through the end of the fiscal (visa) year for which the applicant is selected in the lottery. The year of entitlement for all applicants registered for the DV-2012 program ends as of September 30, 2012. DV visas may not be issued to DV-2012 applicants after that date. Similarly, spouses and children accompanying or following to join DV-2012 principals are only entitled to derivative DV status until September 30, 2012. DV visa availability through the very end of FY-2012 cannot be taken for granted. Numbers could be exhausted prior to September 30.</p>
<p>C. ADVANCE NOTIFICATION OF THE DIVERSITY (DV) IMMIGRANT CATEGORY RANK CUT-OFFS WHICH WILL APPLY IN NOVEMBER</p>
<p>For November, immigrant numbers in the DV category are available to qualified DV-2012 applicants chargeable to all regions/eligible countries as follows. When an allocation cut-off number is shown, visas are available only for applicants with DV regional lottery rank numbers BELOW the specified allocation cut-off number:</p>
<p>Region</p>
<p>All DV Chargeability Areas Except Those Listed Separately</p>
<p>AFRICA</p>
<p>13,000</p>
<p>Except:<br />
Egypt 8,000<br />
Ethiopia 10,000<br />
Nigeria 10,000</p>
<p>ASIA</p>
<p>10,000</p>
<p>EUROPE</p>
<p>11,000</p>
<p>NORTH AMERICA<br />
(BAHAMAS)</p>
<p>4</p>
<p>OCEANIA</p>
<p>500</p>
<p>SOUTH AMERICA,<br />
and the CARIBBEAN</p>
<p>550</p>
<p>D. VISA AVAILABILITY IN THE COMING MONTHS</p>
<p>FAMILY-SPONSORED CATEGORIES</p>
<p>Worldwide dates:<br />
F1: three to six weeks<br />
F2A:three to six weeks<br />
F2B:one to two weeks<br />
F3: one to two weeks<br />
F4: up to one month</p>
<p>Please be advised that the above date ranges are only estimates for the next few months, and are subject to fluctuations in demand.</p>
<p>EMPLOYMENT-BASED CATEGORIES</p>
<p>Employment First: Current<br />
Employment Second:</p>
<p>Worldwide: Current</p>
<p>China and India: The current cut-off date is approaching the most favorable date previously reached for applicants from China and India. The rapid forward movement is intended to generate demand based on new filings for adjustment of status at U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services offices, which currently accounts for over 85% of all Employment-based number use. Once the level of demand increases sufficiently, it may be necessary to slow or stop the cut-off movement, and a retrogression of the cut-offs at some point during the year is a distinct possibility.</p>
<p>Mexico: Current<br />
Philippines: Current</p>
<p>Employment Third:<br />
Worldwide: up to one month<br />
China: one to three weeks<br />
India: up to two weeks<br />
Mexico: up to one month<br />
Philippines: up to one month</p>
<p>Employment Fourth: Current</p>
<p>Employment Fifth: Current</p>
<p>Please be advised that the above date ranges are only estimates for the next few months, and are subject to fluctuations in demand. Those categories with a “Current” projection will remain so for the foreseeable future.</p>
<br />  <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gocomments/theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/355/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/comments/theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/355/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godelicious/theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/355/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/delicious/theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/355/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gofacebook/theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/355/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/facebook/theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/355/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gotwitter/theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/355/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/twitter/theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/355/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gostumble/theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/355/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/stumble/theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/355/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godigg/theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/355/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/digg/theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/355/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/goreddit/theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/355/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/reddit/theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/355/" /></a> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com&amp;blog=6520816&amp;post=355&amp;subd=theimmigrationlawjournal&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/2011/11/06/visa-bulletin-for-october-2011/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/7489bcbd1141f62e3971d4d095a39545?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">theimmigrationlawjournal</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Visa Bulletin for September 2011</title>
		<link>http://theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/2011/11/06/visa-bulletin-for-september-2011/</link>
		<comments>http://theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/2011/11/06/visa-bulletin-for-september-2011/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Nov 2011 21:59:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>theimmigrationlawjournal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Diversity Visa Lottery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Cards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage Green Cards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Immigration Law Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Visa Bulletin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Work Visas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/?p=358</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Number 36
Volume IX
Washington, D.C.

    View as Printer Friendly PDF

A. STATUTORY NUMBERS

1.  This bulletin summarizes the availability of immigrant numbers during September. Consular officers are required to report to the Department of State documentarily qualified applicants for numerically limited visas; U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services in the Department of Homeland Security reports applicants for adjustment of status.  Allocations were made, to the extent possible, in chronological order of reported priority dates, for demand received by August 8th. If not all demand could be satisfied, the category or foreign state in which demand was excessive was deemed oversubscribed.  The cut-off date for an oversubscribed category is the priority date of the first applicant who could not be reached within the numerical limits.  Only applicants who have a priority date earlier than the cut-off date may be allotted a number.  If it becomes necessary during the monthly allocation process to retrogress a cut-off date, supplemental requests for numbers will be honored only if the priority date falls within the new cut-off date announced in this bulletin.

2. The fiscal year 2011 limit for family-sponsored preference immigrants determined in accordance with Section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) is 226,000.  The fiscal year 2011 limit for employment-based preference immigrants calculated under INA 201 is 140,000.  Section 202 prescribes that the per-country limit for preference immigrants is set at 7% of the total annual family-sponsored and employment-based preference limits, i.e., 25,620 for FY-2011.  The dependent area limit is set at 2%, or 7,320.

3.  INA Section 203(e) provides that family-sponsored and employment-based preference visas be issued to eligible immigrants in the order in which a petition in behalf of each has been filed.  Section 203(d) provides that spouses and children of preference immigrants are entitled to the same status, and the same order of consideration, if accompanying or following to join the principal.  The visa prorating provisions of Section 202(e) apply to allocations for a foreign state or dependent area when visa demand exceeds the per-country limit.  These provisions apply at present to the following oversubscribed chargeability areas:  CHINA-mainland born, INDIA, MEXICO, and PHILIPPINES.<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com&amp;blog=6520816&amp;post=358&amp;subd=theimmigrationlawjournal&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Number 36<br /> Volume IX<br /> Washington, D.C.</em></p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://travel.state.gov/pdf/visabulletin/VisaBulletin_September2011.pdf">View as Printer Friendly PDF</a></li>
</ul>
<p><strong>A. STATUTORY NUMBERS</strong></p>
<p>1.  This bulletin summarizes the availability of immigrant numbers during <strong>September</strong>. Consular officers are required to report to the Department of State documentarily qualified applicants for numerically limited visas; U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services in the Department of Homeland Security reports applicants for adjustment of status.  Allocations were made, to the extent possible, in chronological order of reported priority dates, for demand received by August <strong>8th</strong>. If not all demand could be satisfied, the category or foreign state in which demand was excessive was deemed oversubscribed.  The cut-off date for an oversubscribed category is the priority date of the first applicant who could not be reached within the numerical limits.  Only applicants who have a priority date <strong>earlier than</strong> the cut-off date may be allotted a number.  If it becomes necessary during the monthly allocation process to retrogress a cut-off date, supplemental requests for numbers will be honored only if the priority date falls within the new cut-off date announced in this bulletin.</p>
<p>2. The fiscal year 2011 limit for family-sponsored preference immigrants determined in accordance with Section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) is 226,000.  The fiscal year 2011 limit for employment-based preference immigrants calculated under INA 201 is 140,000.  Section 202 prescribes that the per-country limit for preference immigrants is set at 7% of the total annual family-sponsored and employment-based preference limits, i.e., 25,620 for FY-2011.  The dependent area limit is set at 2%, or 7,320.</p>
<p>3.  INA Section 203(e) provides that family-sponsored and employment-based preference visas be issued to eligible immigrants in the order in which a petition in behalf of each has been filed.  Section 203(d) provides that spouses and children of preference immigrants are entitled to the same status, and the same order of consideration, if accompanying or following to join the principal.  The visa prorating provisions of Section 202(e) apply to allocations for a foreign state or dependent area when visa demand exceeds the per-country limit.  These provisions apply at present to the following oversubscribed chargeability areas:  CHINA-mainland born, INDIA, MEXICO, and PHILIPPINES.</p>
<p>4.  Section 203(a) of the INA prescribes preference classes for allotment of Family-sponsored immigrant visas as follows:</p>
<p><strong>FAMILY-SPONSORED PREFERENCES</strong></p>
<p><strong>First</strong><strong>: (F1)</strong> Unmarried Sons and Daughters of U.S. Citizens:  23,400 plus any numbers not required for fourth preference.</p>
<p><strong>Second:</strong> Spouses and Children, and Unmarried Sons and Daughters of Permanent Residents:  114,200, plus the number (if any) by which the worldwide family preference level exceeds 226,000, plus any unused first preference numbers:</p>
<p>A. <strong>(F2A)</strong> Spouses and Children of Permanent Residents:  77% of the overall second preference limitation, of which 75% are exempt from the per-country limit;</p>
<p>B. <strong>(F2B)</strong> Unmarried Sons and Daughters (21 years of age or older) of Permanent Residents:  23% of the overall second preference limitation.</p>
<p><strong>Third: (F3)</strong> Married Sons and Daughters of U.S. Citizens:  23,400, plus any numbers not required by first and second preferences.</p>
<p><strong>Fourth: (F4)</strong> Brothers and Sisters of Adult U.S. Citizens:  65,000, plus any numbers not required by first three preferences.</p>
<p>On the chart below, the listing of a date for any class indicates that the class is oversubscribed (see paragraph 1); &#8220;C&#8221; means current, i.e., numbers are available for all qualified applicants; and &#8220;U&#8221; means unavailable, i.e., no numbers are available.  (NOTE:  Numbers are available only for applicants whose priority date is <strong>earlier</strong> than the cut-off date listed below.)</p>
<table width="424" border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="2">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><strong>Family- Sponsored</strong></td>
<td><strong>All Chargeability Areas Except Those Listed</strong></td>
<td><strong>CHINA-mainland born</strong></td>
<td><strong>INDIA</strong></td>
<td><strong>MEXICO</strong></td>
<td><strong>PHILIPPINES</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>F1</td>
<td>01MAY04</td>
<td>01MAY04</td>
<td>01MAY04</td>
<td>15MAR93</td>
<td>01NOV96</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>F2A</td>
<td>01DEC08</td>
<td>01DEC08</td>
<td>01DEC08</td>
<td>22SEP08</td>
<td>01DEC08</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>F2B</td>
<td>01JUL03</td>
<td>01JUL03</td>
<td>01JUL03</td>
<td>01NOV92</td>
<td>22MAR01</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>F3</td>
<td>22AUG01</td>
<td>22AUG01</td>
<td>22AUG01</td>
<td>22NOV92</td>
<td>15MAY92</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>F4</td>
<td>15APR00</td>
<td>15APR00</td>
<td>15APR00</td>
<td>22MAR96</td>
<td>08JUL88</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>*NOTE:  For September, F2A numbers <strong>EXEMPT from per-country limit</strong> are available to applicants from all countries with priority dates <strong>earlier</strong> than 22SEP08.  F2A numbers <strong>SUBJECT to per-country limit</strong> are available to applicants chargeable to all countries <strong>EXCEPT MEXICO</strong> with priority dates beginning 22SEP08 and earlier than 01DEC08.  (All F2A numbers provided for MEXICO are exempt from the per-country limit; there are no F2A numbers for MEXICO subject to per-country limit.)</p>
<p>5.  Section 203(b) of the INA prescribes preference classes for allotment of Employment-based immigrant visas as follows:</p>
<p><strong>EMPLOYMENT-BASED PREFERENCES</strong></p>
<p><strong>First:</strong>  Priority Workers:  28.6% of the worldwide employment-based preference level, plus any numbers not required for fourth and fifth preferences.</p>
<p><strong>Second:</strong>  Members of the Professions Holding Advanced Degrees or Persons of Exceptional Ability:  28.6% of the worldwide employment-based preference level, plus any numbers not required by first preference.</p>
<p><strong>Third:</strong>  Skilled Workers, Professionals, and Other Workers:  28.6% of the worldwide level, plus any numbers not required by first and second preferences, not more than 10,000 of which to &#8220;*Other Workers&#8221;.</p>
<p><strong>Fourth:</strong>  Certain Special Immigrants:  7.1% of the worldwide level.</p>
<p><strong>Fifth:</strong>  Employment Creation:  7.1% of the worldwide level, not less than 3,000 of which reserved for investors in a targeted rural or high-unemployment area, and 3,000 set aside for investors in regional centers by Sec. 610 of Pub. L. 102-395.</p>
<p>On the chart below, the listing of a date for any class indicates that the class is oversubscribed (see paragraph 1); &#8220;C&#8221; means current, i.e., numbers are available for all qualified applicants; and &#8220;U&#8221; means unavailable, i.e., no numbers are available.  (NOTE:  Numbers are available only for applicants whose priority date is <strong>earlier</strong> than the cut-off date listed below.)</p>
<table width="424" border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="2">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><strong>Employment- Based</strong></td>
<td><strong>All Chargeability Areas Except Those Listed</strong></td>
<td><strong>CHINA- mainland born</strong></td>
<td><strong>INDIA</strong></td>
<td><strong>MEXICO</strong></td>
<td><strong>PHILIPPINES</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td height="20">1st</td>
<td>C</td>
<td>C</td>
<td>C</td>
<td>C</td>
<td>C</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2nd</td>
<td width="71" height="20">C</td>
<td width="71">15APR07</td>
<td width="64">15APR07</td>
<td width="64">C</td>
<td width="71">C</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>3rd</td>
<td height="20">22NOV05</td>
<td>15JUL04</td>
<td>08JUL02</td>
<td>22NOV05</td>
<td>22NOV05</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Other Workers</td>
<td height="20">01AUG05</td>
<td>22APR03</td>
<td>01JUN02</td>
<td>01AUG05</td>
<td>01AUG05</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>4th</td>
<td>C</td>
<td>C</td>
<td>C</td>
<td>C</td>
<td>C</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Certain Religious Workers</td>
<td>C</td>
<td>C</td>
<td>C</td>
<td>C</td>
<td>C</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>5th<br />
Targeted Employment Areas/ Regional Centers and Pilot Programs</td>
<td>C</td>
<td>C</td>
<td>C</td>
<td>C</td>
<td>C</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>*Employment Third Preference Other Workers Category:  Section 203(e) of the Nicaraguan and Central American Relief Act (NACARA) passed by Congress in November 1997, as amended by Section 1(e) of Pub. L. 105-139, provides that once the Employment Third Preference Other Worker (EW) cut-off date has reached the priority date of the latest EW petition approved prior to November 19, 1997, the 10,000 EW numbers available for a fiscal year are to be reduced by up to 5,000 annually beginning in the following fiscal year.  This reduction is to be made for as long as necessary to offset adjustments under the NACARA program.  Since the EW cut-off date reached November 19, 1997 during Fiscal Year 2001, the reduction in the EW annual limit to 5,000 began in Fiscal Year 2002.</p>
<p>6.  The Department of State has a recorded message with visa availability information which can be heard at:  (202) 663-1541.  This recording is updated on or about the tenth of each month with information on cut-off dates for the following month.</p>
<p><strong>B. DIVERSITY IMMIGRANT (DV) CATEGORY</strong></p>
<p>Section 203(c) of the INA provides up to 55,000 immigrant visas each fiscal year to permit additional immigration opportunities for persons from countries with low admissions during the previous five years.  The NACARA stipulates that beginning with DV-99, and for as long as necessary, up to 5,000 of the 55,000 annually-allocated diversity visas will be made available for use under the NACARA program.  <strong>This resulted in reduction of the DV-2011 annual limit to 50,000</strong>.  DV visas are divided among six geographic regions.  No one country can receive more than seven percent of the available diversity visas in any one year.</p>
<p>For <strong>September</strong>, immigrant numbers in the DV category are available to qualified DV-2011 applicants chargeable to all regions/eligible countries as follows. When an allocation cut-off number is shown, visas are available only for applicants with DV regional lottery rank numbers <strong>BELOW</strong> the specified allocation cut-off number:</p>
<table summary="This table shows the priority dates for employment based immigrant visas." width="520" border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="2">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th width="204">Region</th>
<th scope="col" width="100">All DV Chargeability Areas Except Those Listed Separately</th>
<th scope="col" width="147"></th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td scope="col"><strong>AFRICA</strong></td>
<td>CURRENT</td>
<td>Except: Ethiopia 32,700</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td scope="row"><strong>ASIA</strong></td>
<td>CURRENT</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td scope="row"><strong>EUROPE</strong></td>
<td>CURRENT</td>
<td>Except: Uzbekistan  UNAVAILABLE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td scope="row"><strong>NORTH AMERICA (BAHAMAS)</strong></td>
<td>CURRENT</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td scope="row"><strong>OCEANIA</strong></td>
<td>CURRENT</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td scope="row"><strong>SOUTH AMERICA, and the CARIBBEAN</strong></td>
<td>CURRENT</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Entitlement to immigrant status in the DV category lasts only through the end of the fiscal (visa) year for which the applicant is selected in the lottery.  The year of entitlement for all applicants registered for the DV-2011 program ends as of September 30, 2011.  DV visas may not be issued to DV-2011 applicants after that date.  Similarly, spouses and children accompanying or following to join DV-2011 principals are only entitled to derivative DV status until September 30, 2011.  DV visa availability through the very end of FY-2011 cannot be taken for granted.  Numbers could be exhausted prior to September 30.</p>
<p><strong>C. ADVANCE NOTIFICATION OF THE DIVERSITY (DV) IMMIGRANT CATEGORY RANK CUT-OFFS WHICH WILL APPLY IN OCTOBER</strong></p>
<p>For <strong>October</strong>, immigrant numbers in the DV category are available to qualified DV-2012 applicants chargeable to all regions/eligible countries as follows. When an allocation cut-off number is shown, visas are available only for applicants with DV regional lottery rank numbers <strong>BELOW</strong> the specified allocation cut-off number:</p>
<table summary="This table shows the priority dates for employment based immigrant visas." width="520" border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="2">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th width="243">Region</th>
<th scope="col" width="98">All DV Chargeability Areas Except Those Listed Separately</th>
<th scope="col" width="159"></th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td scope="col"><strong>AFRICA</strong></td>
<td>8,500</td>
<td>Except: Egypt 5,000<br />
Ethiopia 7,000<br />
Nigeria 7,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td scope="row"><strong>ASIA</strong></td>
<td>8,000</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td scope="row"><strong>EUROPE</strong></td>
<td>8,500</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td scope="row"><strong>NORTH AMERICA (BAHAMAS)</strong></td>
<td>3</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td scope="row"><strong>OCEANIA</strong></td>
<td>300</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td scope="row"><strong>SOUTH AMERICA, and the CARIBBEAN</strong></td>
<td>400</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><strong>D. DIVERSITY VISA LOTTERY 2012 (DV-2012) RESULTS</strong></p>
<p>The Kentucky Consular Center in Williamsburg, Kentucky has registered and notified the winners of the DV-2012 diversity lottery.  The diversity lottery was conducted under the terms of section 203(c) of the Immigration and Nationality Act and makes available *50,000 permanent resident visas annually to persons from countries with low rates of immigration to the United States.  Approximately 100,021 applicants have been registered and notified and may now make an application for an immigrant visa. Since it is likely that some of the first *50,000 persons registered will not pursue their cases to visa issuance, this larger figure should insure that all DV-2012 numbers will be used during fiscal year 2012 (October 1, 2011 until September 30, 2012).</p>
<p>Applicants registered for the DV-2012 program were selected at random from 14,768,658 qualified entries (19,672,268 with derivatives) received during the 30-day application period that ran from noon on October 5, 2010, until noon, November 3, 2010.  The visas have been apportioned among six geographic regions with a maximum of seven percent available to persons born in any single country.  During the visa interview, principal applicants must provide proof of a high school education or its equivalent, or show two years of work experience in an occupation that requires at least two years of training or experience within the past five years.  Those selected will need to act on their immigrant visa applications quickly.  Applicants should follow the instructions in their notification letter and must fully complete the information requested.</p>
<p>Registrants living legally in the United States who wish to apply for adjustment of their status must contact U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services for information on the requirements and procedures.  Once the total *50,000 visa numbers have been used, the program for fiscal year 2012 will end.  Selected applicants who do not receive visas by September 30, 2012 will derive no further benefit from their DV-2012 registration.  Similarly, spouses and children accompanying or following to join DV-2012 principal applicants are only entitled to derivative diversity visa status until September 30, 2012.</p>
<p>Only participants in the DV-2012 program who were selected for further processing have been notified.  Those who have not received notification were not selected.  They may try for the upcoming DV-2013 lottery if they wish.  The dates for the registration period for the DV-2013 lottery program are expected to be widely publicized at some point during the coming months.</p>
<p>* The Nicaraguan and Central American Relief Act (NACARA) passed by Congress in November 1997 stipulated that up to 5,000 of the 55,000 annually-allocated diversity visas be made available for use under the NACARA program.  The reduction of the limit of available visas to 50,000 began with DV-2000.</p>
<p>The following is the statistical breakdown by foreign-state chargeability of those registered for the DV-2012 program:</p>
<table width="520" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="3">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td colspan="3"><strong>AFRICA</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="36%">ALGERIA 1,799<br />
ANGOLA 42<br />
BENIN 511<br />
BOTSWANA 7<br />
BURKINA FASO 226<br />
BURUNDI 56<br />
CAMEROON 3,374<br />
CAPE VERDE 9<br />
CENTRAL AFRICAN<br />
REP. 3<br />
CHAD 33<br />
COMOROS 9<br />
CONGO 105<br />
CONGO, DEMOCRATIC<br />
REPUBLIC OF THE 3,445<br />
COTE D&#8217;IVOIRE 553<br />
DJIBOUTI 38<br />
EGYPT 4,664<br />
EQUATORIAL GUINEA 4<br />
ERITREA 670</td>
<td valign="top" width="30%">ETHIOPIA 4,902<br />
GABON 48<br />
GAMBIA, THE 113<br />
GHANA 5,832<br />
GUINEA 899<br />
GUINEA-BISSAU 3<br />
KENYA 4,720<br />
LESOTHO 8<br />
LIBERIA 2,101<br />
LIBYA 136<br />
MADAGASCAR 17<br />
MALAWI 16<br />
MALI 76<br />
MAURITANIA 29<br />
MAURITIUS 59<br />
MOROCCO 1,890<br />
MOZAMBIQUE 13<br />
NAMIBIA 10<br />
NIGER 32</td>
<td valign="top" width="34%">NIGERIA 6,024<br />
RWANDA 333<br />
SAO TOME AND<br />
PRINCIPE 0<br />
SENEGAL 270<br />
SEYCHELLES 6<br />
SIERRA LEONE 3,397<br />
SOMALIA 175<br />
SOUTH AFRICA 833<br />
SUDAN 757<br />
SWAZILAND 0<br />
TANZANIA 175<br />
TOGO 845<br />
TUNISIA 113<br />
UGANDA 418<br />
ZAMBIA 79<br />
ZIMBABWE 123</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="3"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="3"><strong>ASIA</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="36%">AFGHANISTAN 109<br />
BAHRAIN 29<br />
BANGLADESH 2,373<br />
BHUTAN 5<br />
BRUNEI 0<br />
BURMA 370<br />
CAMBODIA 596<br />
HONG KONG<br />
SPECIAL ADMIN.<br />
REGION 54<br />
INDONESIA 256<br />
IRAN 4,453</td>
<td valign="top" width="30%">IRAQ 153<br />
ISRAEL 175<br />
JAPAN 435<br />
JORDAN 152<br />
NORTH KOREA 0<br />
KUWAIT 108<br />
LAOS 1<br />
LEBANON 274<br />
MALAYSIA 118<br />
MALDIVES 0<br />
MONGOLIA 209</td>
<td valign="top" width="34%">NEPAL 3,258<br />
OMAN 11<br />
QATAR 19<br />
SAUDI ARABIA 217<br />
SINGAPORE 45<br />
SRI LANKA 708<br />
SYRIA 160<br />
TAIWAN 391<br />
THAILAND 73<br />
TIMOR-LESTE 9<br />
UNITED ARAB<br />
EMIRATES 92<br />
YEMEN 149</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="3"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="3"><strong>EUROPE</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="36%">ALBANIA 1,508<br />
ANDORRA 1<br />
ARMENIA 998<br />
AUSTRIA 130<br />
AZERBAIJAN 304<br />
BELARUS 493<br />
BELGIUM 105<br />
BOSNIA &amp;<br />
HERZEGOVINA 83<br />
BULGARIA 883<br />
CROATIA 107<br />
CYPRUS 26<br />
CZECH REPUBLIC 104<br />
DENMARK 73<br />
ESTONIA 49<br />
FINLAND 91<br />
FRANCE 574<br />
French Polynesia 7<br />
New Caledonia 1<br />
GEORGIA 620<br />
GERMANY 1,709<br />
GREECE 105</td>
<td valign="top" width="30%">HUNGARY 325<br />
ICELAND 56<br />
IRELAND 213<br />
ITALY 529<br />
KAZAKHSTAN 434<br />
KOSOVO 137<br />
KYRGYZSTAN 321<br />
LATVIA 83<br />
LIECHTENSTEIN 0<br />
LITHUANIA 258<br />
LUXEMBOURG 8<br />
MACEDONIA 160<br />
MALTA 20<br />
MOLDOVA 1,238<br />
MONACO 3<br />
MONTENEGRO 18<br />
NETHERLANDS 149<br />
Aruba 4<br />
Curacao 19<br />
St. Maarten 2<br />
NORTHERN<br />
IRELAND 59</td>
<td valign="top" width="34%">NORWAY 84<br />
PORTUGAL 66<br />
Macau 19<br />
ROMANIA 1,327<br />
RUSSIA 2,353<br />
SAN MARINO 1<br />
SERBIA 298<br />
SLOVAKIA 80<br />
SLOVENIA 16<br />
SPAIN 232<br />
SWEDEN 200<br />
SWITZERLAND 229<br />
TAJIKISTAN 270<br />
TURKEY 3,077<br />
TURKMENISTAN 143<br />
UKRAINE 5,799<br />
UZBEKISTAN 4,800<br />
VATICAN CITY 0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="3"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="3"><strong>NORTH AMERICA</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>BAHAMAS, THE 15</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="3"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="3"><strong>OCEANIA</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">AUSTRALIA 900<br />
Christmas Islands 3<br />
Cocos Islands 1<br />
FIJI 628<br />
KIRIBATI 14<br />
MARSHALL ISLANDS 4<br />
MICRONESIA,<br />
FEDERATED<br />
STATES OF 2</td>
<td valign="top">NAURU 5<br />
NEW ZEALAND 309<br />
Cook Islands 6<br />
Niue 14<br />
PALAU 5<br />
PAPUA NEW<br />
GUINEA 0<br />
SAMOA 0<br />
SOLOMON<br />
ISLANDS 0</td>
<td valign="top">TONGA 93<br />
TUVALU 0<br />
VANUATU 8<br />
WESTERN SAMOA 9</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="3" valign="top"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="3" valign="top"><strong>SOUTH AMERICA, CENTRAL AMERICA, AND THE CARIBBEAN</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">ANTIGUA AND<br />
BARBUDA 9<br />
ARGENTINA 101<br />
BARBADOS 25<br />
BELIZE 9<br />
BOLIVIA 84<br />
CHILE 43<br />
COSTA RICA 43<br />
CUBA 292</td>
<td valign="top">DOMINICA 18<br />
GRENADA 24<br />
GUYANA 26<br />
HONDURAS 80<br />
NICARAGUA 49<br />
PANAMA 21<br />
PARAGUAY 17<br />
SAINT KITTS AND<br />
NEVIS 7</td>
<td valign="top">SAINT LUCIA 4<br />
SAINT VINCENT AND<br />
THE GRENADINES 16<br />
SURINAME 15<br />
TRINIDAD AND<br />
TOBAGO 175<br />
URUGUAY 19<br />
VENEZUELA 925</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Natives of the following countries were not eligible to participate in DV-2012: Brazil, Canada, China (mainland-born, excluding Hong Kong S.A.R. and Taiwan), Colombia, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, El Salvador, Guatemala, Haiti, India, Jamaica, Mexico, Pakistan, Peru, the Philippines, Poland, South Korea, United Kingdom (except Northern Ireland) and its dependent territories, and Vietnam.</p>
<br />  <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gocomments/theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/358/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/comments/theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/358/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godelicious/theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/358/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/delicious/theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/358/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gofacebook/theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/358/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/facebook/theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/358/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gotwitter/theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/358/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/twitter/theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/358/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gostumble/theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/358/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/stumble/theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/358/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godigg/theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/358/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/digg/theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/358/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/goreddit/theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/358/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/reddit/theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/358/" /></a> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com&amp;blog=6520816&amp;post=358&amp;subd=theimmigrationlawjournal&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/2011/11/06/visa-bulletin-for-september-2011/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/7489bcbd1141f62e3971d4d095a39545?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">theimmigrationlawjournal</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Visa Bulletin for August 2011</title>
		<link>http://theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/2011/11/06/visa-bulletin-for-august-2011/</link>
		<comments>http://theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/2011/11/06/visa-bulletin-for-august-2011/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Nov 2011 21:55:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>theimmigrationlawjournal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marriage Green Cards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Immigration Law Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Visa Bulletin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Work Visas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/?p=348</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Number 35
Volume IX
Washington, D.C.

View as Printer Friendly PDF

A. STATUTORY NUMBERS

1. This bulletin summarizes the availability of immigrant numbers during August. Consular officers are required to report to the Department of State documentarily qualified applicants for numerically limited visas; U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services in the Department of Homeland Security reports applicants for adjustment of status. Allocations were made, to the extent possible, in chronological order of reported priority dates, for demand received by July 11th. If not all demand could be satisfied, the category or foreign state in which demand was excessive was deemed oversubscribed. The cut-off date for an oversubscribed category is the priority date of the first applicant who could not be reached within the numerical limits. Only applicants who have a priority date earlier than the cut-off date may be allotted a number. If it becomes necessary during the monthly allocation process to retrogress a cut-off date, supplemental requests for numbers will be honored only if the priority date falls within the new cut-off date announced in this bulletin.

2. The fiscal year 2011 limit for family-sponsored preference immigrants determined in accordance with Section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) is 226,000. The fiscal year 2011 limit for employment-based preference immigrants calculated under INA 201 is 140,000. Section 202 prescribes that the per-country limit for preference immigrants is set at 7% of the total annual family-sponsored and employment-based preference limits, i.e., 25,620 for FY-2011. The dependent area limit is set at 2%, or 7,320.

3. INA Section 203(e) provides that family-sponsored and employment-based preference visas be issued to eligible immigrants in the order in which a petition in behalf of each has been filed. Section 203(d) provides that spouses and children of preference immigrants are entitled to the same status, and the same order of consideration, if accompanying or following to join the principal. The visa prorating provisions of Section 202(e) apply to allocations for a foreign state or dependent area when visa demand exceeds the per-country limit. These provisions apply at present to the following oversubscribed chargeability areas: CHINA-mainland born, INDIA, MEXICO, and PHILIPPINES.

4. Section 203(a) of the INA prescribes preference classes for allotment of Family-sponsored immigrant visas as follows:

FAMILY-SPONSORED PREFERENCES

First: (F1) Unmarried Sons and Daughters of U.S. Citizens: 23,400 plus any numbers not required for fourth preference.

Second: Spouses and Children, and Unmarried Sons and Daughters of Permanent Residents: 114,200, plus the number (if any) by which the worldwide family preference level exceeds 226,000, plus any unused first preference numbers:<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com&amp;blog=6520816&amp;post=348&amp;subd=theimmigrationlawjournal&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Number 35<br />
Volume IX<br />
Washington, D.C.</p>
<p>View as Printer Friendly PDF</p>
<p>A. STATUTORY NUMBERS</p>
<p>1. This bulletin summarizes the availability of immigrant numbers during August. Consular officers are required to report to the Department of State documentarily qualified applicants for numerically limited visas; U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services in the Department of Homeland Security reports applicants for adjustment of status. Allocations were made, to the extent possible, in chronological order of reported priority dates, for demand received by July 11th. If not all demand could be satisfied, the category or foreign state in which demand was excessive was deemed oversubscribed. The cut-off date for an oversubscribed category is the priority date of the first applicant who could not be reached within the numerical limits. Only applicants who have a priority date earlier than the cut-off date may be allotted a number. If it becomes necessary during the monthly allocation process to retrogress a cut-off date, supplemental requests for numbers will be honored only if the priority date falls within the new cut-off date announced in this bulletin.</p>
<p>2. The fiscal year 2011 limit for family-sponsored preference immigrants determined in accordance with Section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) is 226,000. The fiscal year 2011 limit for employment-based preference immigrants calculated under INA 201 is 140,000. Section 202 prescribes that the per-country limit for preference immigrants is set at 7% of the total annual family-sponsored and employment-based preference limits, i.e., 25,620 for FY-2011. The dependent area limit is set at 2%, or 7,320.</p>
<p>3. INA Section 203(e) provides that family-sponsored and employment-based preference visas be issued to eligible immigrants in the order in which a petition in behalf of each has been filed. Section 203(d) provides that spouses and children of preference immigrants are entitled to the same status, and the same order of consideration, if accompanying or following to join the principal. The visa prorating provisions of Section 202(e) apply to allocations for a foreign state or dependent area when visa demand exceeds the per-country limit. These provisions apply at present to the following oversubscribed chargeability areas: CHINA-mainland born, INDIA, MEXICO, and PHILIPPINES.</p>
<p>4. Section 203(a) of the INA prescribes preference classes for allotment of Family-sponsored immigrant visas as follows:</p>
<p>FAMILY-SPONSORED PREFERENCES</p>
<p>First: (F1) Unmarried Sons and Daughters of U.S. Citizens: 23,400 plus any numbers not required for fourth preference.</p>
<p>Second: Spouses and Children, and Unmarried Sons and Daughters of Permanent Residents: 114,200, plus the number (if any) by which the worldwide family preference level exceeds 226,000, plus any unused first preference numbers:</p>
<p>A. (F2A) Spouses and Children of Permanent Residents: 77% of the overall second preference limitation, of which 75% are exempt from the per-country limit;</p>
<p>B. (F2B) Unmarried Sons and Daughters (21 years of age or older) of Permanent Residents: 23% of the overall second preference limitation.</p>
<p>Third: (F3) Married Sons and Daughters of U.S. Citizens: 23,400, plus any numbers not required by first and second preferences.</p>
<p>Fourth: (F4) Brothers and Sisters of Adult U.S. Citizens: 65,000, plus any numbers not required by first three preferences.</p>
<p>On the chart below, the listing of a date for any class indicates that the class is oversubscribed (see paragraph 1); &#8220;C&#8221; means current, i.e., numbers are available for all qualified applicants; and &#8220;U&#8221; means unavailable, i.e., no numbers are available. (NOTE: Numbers are available only for applicants whose priority date is earlier than the cut-off date listed below.)</p>
<p>Family- Sponsored</p>
<p>All Chargeability Areas<br />
Except Those Listed</p>
<p>CHINA- mainland born</p>
<p>INDIA</p>
<p>MEXICO</p>
<p>PHILIPPINES</p>
<p>F1</p>
<p>01MAY04</p>
<p>01MAY04</p>
<p>01MAY04</p>
<p>08MAR93</p>
<p>15APR96</p>
<p>F2A<br />
22JUL08 22JUL08 22JUL08 01JUN08</p>
<p>22JUL08</p>
<p>F2B<br />
01JUL03 01JUL03 01JUL03 01OCT92 01DEC00</p>
<p>F3<br />
22AUG01 22AUG01 22AUG01 15NOV92 01APR92</p>
<p>F4<br />
08APR00 08APR00 08APR00 08MAR96</p>
<p>15MAY88</p>
<p>*NOTE: For August, F2A numbers EXEMPT from per-country limit are available to applicants from all countries with priority dates earlier than 01JUN08. F2A numbers SUBJECT to per-country limit are available to applicants chargeable to all countries EXCEPT MEXICO with priority dates beginning 01JUN08 and earlier than 22JUL08. (All F2A numbers provided for MEXICO are exempt from the per-country limit; there are no F2A numbers for MEXICO subject to per-country limit.)</p>
<p>5. Section 203(b) of the INA prescribes preference classes for allotment of Employment-based immigrant visas as follows:</p>
<p>EMPLOYMENT-BASED PREFERENCES</p>
<p>First: Priority Workers: 28.6% of the worldwide employment-based preference level, plus any numbers not required for fourth and fifth preferences.</p>
<p>Second: Members of the Professions Holding Advanced Degrees or Persons of Exceptional Ability: 28.6% of the worldwide employment-based preference level, plus any numbers not required by first preference.</p>
<p>Third: Skilled Workers, Professionals, and Other Workers: 28.6% of the worldwide level, plus any numbers not required by first and second preferences, not more than 10,000 of which to &#8220;*Other Workers&#8221;.</p>
<p>Fourth: Certain Special Immigrants: 7.1% of the worldwide level.</p>
<p>Fifth: Employment Creation: 7.1% of the worldwide level, not less than 3,000 of which reserved for investors in a targeted rural or high-unemployment area, and 3,000 set aside for investors in regional centers by Sec. 610 of Pub. L. 102-395.</p>
<p>On the chart below, the listing of a date for any class indicates that the class is oversubscribed (see paragraph 1); &#8220;C&#8221; means current, i.e., numbers are available for all qualified applicants; and &#8220;U&#8221; means unavailable, i.e., no numbers are available. (NOTE: Numbers are available only for applicants whose priority date is earlier than the cut-off date listed below.)</p>
<p>Employment- Based<br />
All Charge-ability Areas Except Those Listed CHINA- mainland born INDIA MEXICO PHILIPPINES</p>
<p>1st</p>
<p>C</p>
<p>C</p>
<p>C</p>
<p>C</p>
<p>C</p>
<p>2nd</p>
<p>C</p>
<p>15APR07</p>
<p>15APR07</p>
<p>C</p>
<p>C</p>
<p>3rd<br />
01NOV05 08JUL04 01JUN02 01NOV05 01NOV05</p>
<p>Other Workers<br />
01MAY05 22APR03 01JUN02 01MAY05 01MAY05</p>
<p>4th</p>
<p>C</p>
<p>C</p>
<p>C</p>
<p>C</p>
<p>C</p>
<p>Certain Religious Workers</p>
<p>C</p>
<p>C</p>
<p>C</p>
<p>C</p>
<p>C</p>
<p>5th<br />
Targeted Employment Areas/ Regional Centers and Pilot Programs</p>
<p>C</p>
<p>C</p>
<p>C</p>
<p>C</p>
<p>C</p>
<p>*Employment Third Preference Other Workers Category: Section 203(e) of the Nicaraguan and Central American Relief Act (NACARA) passed by Congress in November 1997, as amended by Section 1(e) of Pub. L. 105-139, provides that once the Employment Third Preference Other Worker (EW) cut-off date has reached the priority date of the latest EW petition approved prior to November 19, 1997, the 10,000 EW numbers available for a fiscal year are to be reduced by up to 5,000 annually beginning in the following fiscal year. This reduction is to be made for as long as necessary to offset adjustments under the NACARA program. Since the EW cut-off date reached November 19, 1997 during Fiscal Year 2001, the reduction in the EW annual limit to 5,000 began in Fiscal Year 2002.</p>
<p>6. The Department of State has a recorded message with visa availability information which can be heard at: (202) 663-1541. This recording is updated on or about the tenth of each month with information on cut-off dates for the following month.</p>
<p>B. DIVERSITY IMMIGRANT (DV) CATEGORY</p>
<p>Section 203(c) of the INA provides up to 55,000 immigrant visas each fiscal year to permit additional immigration opportunities for persons from countries with low admissions during the previous five years. The NACARA stipulates that beginning with DV-99, and for as long as necessary, up to 5,000 of the 55,000 annually-allocated diversity visas will be made available for use under the NACARA program. This resulted in reduction of the DV-2011 annual limit to 50,000. DV visas are divided among six geographic regions. No one country can receive more than seven percent of the available diversity visas in any one year.</p>
<p>For August, immigrant numbers in the DV category are available to qualified DV-2011 applicants chargeable to all regions/eligible countries as follows. When an allocation cut-off number is shown, visas are available only for applicants with DV regional lottery rank numbers BELOW the specified allocation cut-off number:</p>
<p>Region</p>
<p>All DV Chargeability Areas<br />
Except Those Listed Separately<br />
Except</p>
<p>AFRICA</p>
<p>71,800</p>
<p>Ethiopia 32,400</p>
<p>ASIA</p>
<p>39,750</p>
<p>EUROPE</p>
<p>CURRENT</p>
<p>Uzbekistan UNAVAILABLE</p>
<p>NORTH AMERICA<br />
(BAHAMAS)</p>
<p>CURRENT</p>
<p>OCEANIA</p>
<p>CURRENT</p>
<p>SOUTH AMERICA,<br />
and the CARIBBEAN</p>
<p>CURRENT</p>
<p>Entitlement to immigrant status in the DV category lasts only through the end of the fiscal (visa) year for which the applicant is selected in the lottery. The year of entitlement for all applicants registered for the DV-2011 program ends as of September 30, 2011. DV visas may not be issued to DV-2011 applicants after that date. Similarly, spouses and children accompanying or following to join DV-2011 principals are only entitled to derivative DV status until September 30, 2011. DV visa availability through the very end of FY-2011 cannot be taken for granted. Numbers could be exhausted prior to September 30.</p>
<p>C. ADVANCE NOTIFICATION OF THE DIVERSITY (DV) IMMIGRANT CATEGORY RANK CUT-OFFS WHICH WILL APPLY IN SEPTEMBER</p>
<p>For September, immigrant numbers in the DV category are available to qualified DV-2011 applicants chargeable to all regions/eligible countries as follows. When an allocation cut-off number is shown, visas are available only for applicants with DV regional lottery rank numbers BELOW the specified allocation cut-off number:</p>
<p>Region</p>
<p>All DV Chargeability Areas<br />
Except Those Listed Separately<br />
Except</p>
<p>AFRICA</p>
<p>CURRENT</p>
<p>Ethiopia 32,700</p>
<p>ASIA</p>
<p>CURRENT</p>
<p>EUROPE</p>
<p>CURRENT</p>
<p>Uzbekistan UNAVAILABLE</p>
<p>NORTH AMERICA<br />
(BAHAMAS)</p>
<p>CURRENT</p>
<p>OCEANIA</p>
<p>CURRENT</p>
<p>SOUTH AMERICA,<br />
and the CARIBBEAN</p>
<p>CURRENT</p>
<p>D. SEPTEMBER VISA AVAILABILITY</p>
<p>Heavy applicant demand for numbers in the Family First preference could require retrogression of some of the September Family First preference cut-off dates. This action may be necessary to keep visa issuances within the respective annual preference numerical limits. If this were to occur they could be expected to return to the previous cut-off date for October, the first month of the new fiscal year.</p>
<p>E. DETERMINATION OF THE NUMERICAL LIMITS ON IMMIGRANTS REQUIRED UNDER THE TERMS OF THE IMMIGRATION AND NATIONALITY ACT (INA)</p>
<p>The State Department is required to make a determination of the worldwide numerical limitations, as outlined in Sections 201(c) and (d) of the INA, on an annual basis. These calculations are based in part on data provided by U.S. Citizen and Immigration Services (USCIS) regarding the number of immediate relative adjustments in the preceding year and the number of aliens paroled into the United States under Section 212(d)(5) in the second preceding year. Without this information, it is impossible to make an official determination of the annual limits. To avoid delays in processing while waiting for the CIS data, the Visa Office (VO) bases allocations on the minimum annual limits outlined in Section 201 of the INA. On June 9th, USCIS provided the required data to VO.</p>
<p>The Department of State has determined the Family and Employment preference numerical limits for FY-2011 in accordance with the terms of Section 201 of the INA. These numerical limitations for FY-2011 are as follows:</p>
<p>Worldwide Family-Sponsored preference limit: 226,000<br />
Worldwide Employment-Based preference limit: 140,000</p>
<p>Under INA Section 202(a), the per-country limit is fixed at 7% of the family and employment annual limits. For FY-2011 the per-country limit is 25,620. The dependent area annual limit is 2%, or 7,320.</p>
<br />  <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gocomments/theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/348/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/comments/theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/348/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godelicious/theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/348/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/delicious/theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/348/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gofacebook/theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/348/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/facebook/theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/348/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gotwitter/theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/348/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/twitter/theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/348/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gostumble/theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/348/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/stumble/theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/348/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godigg/theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/348/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/digg/theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/348/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/goreddit/theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/348/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/reddit/theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/348/" /></a> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com&amp;blog=6520816&amp;post=348&amp;subd=theimmigrationlawjournal&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/2011/11/06/visa-bulletin-for-august-2011/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/7489bcbd1141f62e3971d4d095a39545?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">theimmigrationlawjournal</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Visa Bulletin for July 2011</title>
		<link>http://theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/2011/07/05/visa-bulletin-for-july-2011/</link>
		<comments>http://theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/2011/07/05/visa-bulletin-for-july-2011/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2011 16:55:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>theimmigrationlawjournal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Diversity Visa Lottery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration Updates from USCIS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Immigration Law Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Visa Bulletin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/?p=351</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Number 34
Volume IX
Washington, D.C.

View as Printer Friendly PDF
A.
 STATUTORY NUMBERS
 

1. This bulletin summarizes the availability of immigrant numbers during July. Consular officers are required to report to the Department of State documentarily qualified applicants for numerically limited visas; U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services in the Department of Homeland Security reports applicants for adjustment of status. Allocations were made, to the extent possible, in chronological order of reported priority dates, for demand received by June 8th. If not all demand could be satisfied, the category or foreign state in which demand was excessive was deemed oversubscribed. The cut-off date for an oversubscribed category is the priority date of the first applicant who could not be reached within the numerical limits. Only applicants who have a priority date earlier than the cut-off date may be allotted a number. If it becomes necessary during the monthly allocation process to retrogress a cut-off date, supplemental requests for numbers will be honored only if the priority date falls within the new cut-off date announced in this bulletin.

<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com&amp;blog=6520816&amp;post=351&amp;subd=theimmigrationlawjournal&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Number 34<br />Volume IX<br />Washington, D.C.</em></p>
<div id="ContentBody">
<ul>
<li><a href="http://travel.state.gov/pdf/visabulletin/VisaBulletin_July2011.pdf">View as Printer Friendly PDF</a></li>
</ul>
<table width="100%" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="10%">A.</td>
<td><strong>STATUTORY NUMBERS</strong></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>1. This bulletin summarizes the availability of immigrant numbers during <strong>July</strong>. Consular officers are required to report to the Department of State documentarily qualified applicants for numerically limited visas; U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services in the Department of Homeland Security reports applicants for adjustment of status. Allocations were made, to the extent possible, in chronological order of reported priority dates, for demand received by June <strong>8th</strong>. If not all demand could be satisfied, the category or foreign state in which demand was excessive was deemed oversubscribed. The cut-off date for an oversubscribed category is the priority date of the first applicant who could not be reached within the numerical limits. Only applicants who have a priority date <strong>earlier than</strong> the cut-off date may be allotted a number. If it becomes necessary during the monthly allocation process to retrogress a cut-off date, supplemental requests for numbers will be honored only if the priority date falls within the new cut-off date announced in this bulletin.</p>
<p>2. Section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) sets an annual minimum family-sponsored preference limit of 226,000. The worldwide level for annual employment-based preference immigrants is at least 140,000. Section 202 prescribes that the per-country limit for preference immigrants is set at 7% of the total annual family-sponsored and employment-based preference limits, i.e., 25,620. The dependent area limit is set at 2%, or 7,320.</p>
<p>3. INA Section 203(e) provides that family-sponsored and employment-based preference visas be issued to eligible immigrants in the order in which a petition in behalf of each has been filed. Section 203(d) provides that spouses and children of preference immigrants are entitled to the same status, and the same order of consideration, if accompanying or following to join the principal. The visa prorating provisions of Section 202(e) apply to allocations for a foreign state or dependent area when visa demand exceeds the per-country limit. These provisions apply at present to the following oversubscribed chargeability areas: CHINA-mainland born, INDIA, MEXICO, and PHILIPPINES.<br />
4. Section 203(a) of the INA prescribes preference classes for allotment of Family-sponsored immigrant visas as follows:</p>
<p><strong>FAMILY-SPONSORED PREFERENCES</strong></p>
<p><strong>First (F1):</strong> Unmarried Sons and Daughters of U.S. Citizens: 23,400 plus any numbers not required for fourth preference.</p>
<p><strong>Second:</strong> Spouses and Children, and Unmarried Sons and Daughters of Permanent Residents: 114,200, plus the number (if any) by which the worldwide family preference level exceeds 226,000, plus any unused first preference numbers:<br />
<strong>A. (F2A)</strong> Spouses and Children of Permanent Residents: 77% of the overall second preference limitation, of which 75% are exempt from the per-country limit;<br />
<strong>B. (F2B)</strong> Unmarried Sons and Daughters (21 years of age or older) of Permanent Residents: 23% of the overall second preference limitation.</p>
<p><strong>Third (F3):</strong> Married Sons and Daughters of U.S. Citizens: 23,400, plus any numbers not required by first and second preferences.</p>
<p><strong>Fourth (F4):</strong> Brothers and Sisters of Adult U.S. Citizens: 65,000, plus any numbers not required by first three preferences.</p>
<p>On the chart below, the listing of a date for any class indicates that the class is oversubscribed (see paragraph 1); &#8220;C&#8221; means current, i.e., numbers are available for all qualified applicants; and &#8220;U&#8221; means unavailable, i.e., no numbers are available. (NOTE: Numbers are available only for applicants whose priority date is <strong>earlier</strong> than the cut-off date listed below.)</p>
<table border="1" cellpadding="1">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><strong>Family- Sponsored</strong></td>
<td><strong>All Chargeability Areas Except Those Listed</strong></td>
<td><strong>CHINA- mainland born</strong></td>
<td><strong>INDIA</strong></td>
<td><strong>MEXICO</strong></td>
<td><strong>PHILIPPINES</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>F1</strong></td>
<td>01MAY04</td>
<td>01MAY04</td>
<td>01MAY04</td>
<td>08MAR93</td>
<td>15APR96</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>F2A</strong></td>
<td>22MAR08</td>
<td>22MAR08</td>
<td>22MAR08</td>
<td>15FEB08</td>
<td>22MAR08</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>F2B</strong></td>
<td>01JUL03</td>
<td>01JUL03</td>
<td>01JUL03</td>
<td>22SEP92</td>
<td>22SEP00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>F3</strong></td>
<td>15JUL01</td>
<td>15JUL01</td>
<td>15JUL01</td>
<td>15NOV92</td>
<td>22MAR92</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>F4</strong></td>
<td>08MAR00</td>
<td>08MAR00</td>
<td>08MAR00</td>
<td>01MAR96</td>
<td>15MAY88</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>*NOTE: For July, F2A numbers <strong>EXEMPT from per-country limit</strong> are available to applicants from all countries with priority dates <strong>earlier</strong> than 15FEB08. F2A numbers <strong>SUBJECT to per-country limit</strong> are available to applicants chargeable to all countries <strong>EXCEPT MEXICO</strong> with priority dates beginning 15FEB08 and earlier than 22MAR08. (All F2A numbers provided for MEXICO are exempt from the per-country limit; there are no F2A numbers for MEXICO subject to per-country limit.)<br />
5. Section 203(b) of the INA prescribes preference classes for allotment of Employment-based immigrant visas as follows:</p>
<p><strong>EMPLOYMENT-BASED PREFERENCES</strong></p>
<p><strong>First:</strong> Priority Workers: 28.6% of the worldwide employment-based preference level, plus any numbers not required for fourth and fifth preferences.</p>
<p><strong>Second:</strong> Members of the Professions Holding Advanced Degrees or Persons of Exceptional Ability: 28.6% of the worldwide employment-based preference level, plus any numbers not required by first preference.</p>
<p><strong>Third:</strong> Skilled Workers, Professionals, and Other Workers: 28.6% of the worldwide level, plus any numbers not required by first and second preferences, not more than 10,000 of which to &#8220;*Other Workers&#8221;.</p>
<p><strong>Fourth:</strong> Certain Special Immigrants: 7.1% of the worldwide level.</p>
<p><strong>Fifth:</strong> Employment Creation: 7.1% of the worldwide level, not less than 3,000 of which reserved for investors in a targeted rural or high-unemployment area, and 3,000 set aside for investors in regional centers by Sec. 610 of P.L. 102-395.</p>
<p>On the chart below, the listing of a date for any class indicates that the class is oversubscribed (see paragraph 1); &#8220;C&#8221; means current, i.e., numbers are available for all qualified applicants; and &#8220;U&#8221; means unavailable, i.e., no numbers are available. (NOTE: Numbers are available only for applicants whose priority date is <strong>earlier</strong> than the cut-off date listed below.)</p>
<table border="1" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><strong>Employment</strong><strong>-</strong> <strong>Based</strong></td>
<td><strong>All Charge-ability Areas Except Those Listed</strong></td>
<td><strong>CHINA- mainland born</strong></td>
<td><strong>INDIA</strong></td>
<td><strong>MEXICO</strong></td>
<td><strong>PHILIPPINES</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>1st</strong></td>
<td>C</td>
<td>C</td>
<td>C</td>
<td>C</td>
<td>C</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>2nd</strong></td>
<td>C</td>
<td>08MAR07</td>
<td>08MAR07</td>
<td>C</td>
<td>C</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>3rd</strong></td>
<td>08OCT05</td>
<td>01JUL04</td>
<td>01MAY02</td>
<td>01JUL05</td>
<td>08OCT05</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Other Workers</strong></td>
<td>22NOV04</td>
<td>22APR03</td>
<td>01MAY02</td>
<td>22NOV04</td>
<td>22NOV04</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>4th</strong></td>
<td>C</td>
<td>C</td>
<td>C</td>
<td>C</td>
<td>C</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Certain Religious Workers</strong></td>
<td>C</td>
<td>C</td>
<td>C</td>
<td>C</td>
<td>C</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>5th<br />
Targeted Employment Areas/ Regional Centers and Pilot Programs</strong></td>
<td>C</td>
<td>C</td>
<td>C</td>
<td>C</td>
<td>C</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>*Employment Third Preference Other Workers Category: Section 203(e) of the Nicaraguan and Central American Relief Act (NACARA) passed by Congress in November 1997, as amended by Section 1(e) of Pub. L. 105-139, provides that once the Employment Third Preference Other Worker (EW) cut-off date has reached the priority date of the latest EW petition approved prior to November 19, 1997, the 10,000 EW numbers available for a fiscal year are to be reduced by up to 5,000 annually beginning in the following fiscal year. This reduction is to be made for as long as necessary to offset adjustments under the NACARA program. Since the EW cut-off date reached November 19, 1997 during Fiscal Year 2001, the reduction in the EW annual limit to 5,000 began in Fiscal Year 2002.</p>
<p>6. The Department of State has a recorded message with visa availability information which can be heard at: (202) 663-1541. This recording is updated on or about the tenth of each month with information on cut-off dates for the following month.</p>
<table width="100%" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="10%">B.</td>
<td width="90%"><strong>DIVERSITY IMMIGRANT (DV) CATEGORY</strong></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Section 203(c) of the INA provides up to 55,000 immigrant visas each fiscal year to permit additional immigration opportunities for persons from countries with low admissions during the previous five years. The NACARA stipulates that beginning with DV-99, and for as long as necessary, up to 5,000 of the 55,000 annually-allocated diversity visas will be made available for use under the NACARA program. This resulted in reduction of the DV-2011 annual limit to 50,000. DV visas are divided among six geographic regions. No one country can receive more than seven percent of the available diversity visas in any one year.</p>
<p>For <strong>July</strong>, immigrant numbers in the DV category are available to qualified DV-2011 applicants chargeable to all regions/eligible countries as follows. When an allocation cut-off number is shown, visas are available only for applicants with DV regional lottery rank numbers <strong>BELOW</strong> the specified allocation cut-off number:</p>
<table border="1" cellpadding="2">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><strong>Region</strong></td>
<td><strong>All DV Chargeability Areas<br />
Except Those Listed Separately</strong></td>
<td><strong>Except</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>AFRICA</strong></td>
<td>57,600</td>
<td>Egypt 35,000<br />
Ethiopia 30,650<br />
Nigeria 18,500</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>ASIA</strong></td>
<td>33,775</td>
<td> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>EUROPE</strong></td>
<td>33,000</td>
<td>Uzbekistan 28,200</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>NORTH AMERICA<br />
(BAHAMAS)</strong></td>
<td>12</td>
<td> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>OCEANIA</strong></td>
<td>1,400</td>
<td> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>SOUTH AMERICA,<br />
and the CARIBBEAN</strong></td>
<td>1,400</td>
<td> </td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Entitlement to immigrant status in the DV category lasts only through the end of the fiscal (visa) year for which the applicant is selected in the lottery. The year of entitlement for all applicants registered for the DV-2011 program ends as of September 30, 2011. DV visas may not be issued to DV-2011 applicants after that date. Similarly, spouses and children accompanying or following to join DV-2011 principals are only entitled to derivative DV status until September 30, 2011. DV visa availability through the very end of FY-2011 cannot be taken for granted. Numbers could be exhausted prior to September 30.</p>
<table>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="10%">C.</td>
<td width="90%"><strong>ADVANCE NOTIFICATION OF THE DIVERSITY (DV) IMMIGRANT CATEGORY RANK CUT-OFFS WHICH WILL APPLY IN AUGUST</strong></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>For <strong>August</strong>, immigrant numbers in the DV category are available to qualified DV-2011 applicants chargeable to all regions/eligible countries as follows. When an allocation cut-off number is shown, visas are available only for applicants with DV regional lottery rank numbers <strong>BELOW</strong> the specified allocation cut-off number:</p>
<table border="1" cellpadding="2">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><strong>Region</strong></td>
<td><strong>All DV Chargeability Areas<br />
Except Those Listed Separately</strong></td>
<td><strong>Except</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>AFRICA</strong></td>
<td>71,800</td>
<td>Ethiopia 32,400</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>ASIA</strong></td>
<td>39,750</td>
<td> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>EUROPE</strong></td>
<td>CURRENT</td>
<td>Uzbekistan UNAVAILABLE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>NORTH AMERICA<br />
(BAHAMAS)</strong></td>
<td>CURRENT</td>
<td> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>OCEANIA</strong></td>
<td>CURRENT</td>
<td> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>SOUTH AMERICA,<br />
</strong><strong>and the CARIBBEAN</strong></td>
<td>CURRENT</td>
<td> </td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
<br />  <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gocomments/theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/351/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/comments/theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/351/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godelicious/theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/351/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/delicious/theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/351/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gofacebook/theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/351/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/facebook/theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/351/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gotwitter/theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/351/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/twitter/theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/351/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gostumble/theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/351/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/stumble/theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/351/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godigg/theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/351/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/digg/theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/351/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/goreddit/theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/351/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/reddit/theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/351/" /></a> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com&amp;blog=6520816&amp;post=351&amp;subd=theimmigrationlawjournal&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/2011/07/05/visa-bulletin-for-july-2011/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/7489bcbd1141f62e3971d4d095a39545?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">theimmigrationlawjournal</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Visa Bulletin For June 2011</title>
		<link>http://theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/2011/07/05/visa-bulletin-for-june-2011/</link>
		<comments>http://theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/2011/07/05/visa-bulletin-for-june-2011/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2011 16:50:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>theimmigrationlawjournal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Diversity Visa Lottery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration Updates from USCIS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Immigration Law Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Visa Bulletin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/?p=341</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Number 33
Volume IX
Washington, D.C.

1. STATUTORY NUMBERS

1. This bulletin summarizes the availability of immigrant numbers during June. Consular officers are required to report to the Department of State documentarily qualified applicants for numerically limited visas; U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services in the Department of Homeland Security reports applicants for adjustment of status. Allocations were made, to the extent possible, in chronological order of reported priority dates, for demand received by May 11th. If not all demand could be satisfied, the category or foreign state in which demand was excessive was deemed oversubscribed. The cut-off date for an oversubscribed category is the priority date of the first applicant who could not be reached within the numerical limits. Only applicants who have a priority date earlier than the cut-off date may be allotted a number. If it becomes necessary during the monthly allocation process to retrogress a cut-off date, supplemental requests for numbers will be honored only if the priority date falls within the new cut-off date announced in this bulletin.

<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com&amp;blog=6520816&amp;post=341&amp;subd=theimmigrationlawjournal&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Number 33<br />
Volume IX<br />
Washington, D.C.</p>
<p>1. STATUTORY NUMBERS</p>
<p>1. This bulletin summarizes the availability of immigrant numbers during June. Consular officers are required to report to the Department of State documentarily qualified applicants for numerically limited visas; U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services in the Department of Homeland Security reports applicants for adjustment of status. Allocations were made, to the extent possible, in chronological order of reported priority dates, for demand received by May 11th. If not all demand could be satisfied, the category or foreign state in which demand was excessive was deemed oversubscribed. The cut-off date for an oversubscribed category is the priority date of the first applicant who could not be reached within the numerical limits. Only applicants who have a priority date earlier than the cut-off date may be allotted a number. If it becomes necessary during the monthly allocation process to retrogress a cut-off date, supplemental requests for numbers will be honored only if the priority date falls within the new cut-off date announced in this bulletin.</p>
<p>2. Section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) sets an annual minimum family-sponsored preference limit of 226,000. The worldwide level for annual employment-based preference immigrants is at least 140,000. Section 202 prescribes that the per-country limit for preference immigrants is set at 7% of the total annual family-sponsored and employment-based preference limits, i.e., 25,620. The dependent area limit is set at 2%, or 7,320.</p>
<p>3. INA Section 203(e) provides that family-sponsored and employment-based preference visas be issued to eligible immigrants in the order in which a petition in behalf of each has been filed. Section 203(d) provides that spouses and children of preference immigrants are entitled to the same status, and the same order of consideration, if accompanying or following to join the principal. The visa prorating provisions of Section 202(e) apply to allocations for a foreign state or dependent area when visa demand exceeds the per-country limit. These provisions apply at present to the following oversubscribed chargeability areas: CHINA-mainland born, INDIA, MEXICO, and PHILIPPINES.</p>
<p>4. Section 203(a) of the INA prescribes preference classes for allotment of Family-sponsored immigrant visas as follows:</p>
<p>FAMILY-SPONSORED PREFERENCES</p>
<p>First (F1): Unmarried Sons and Daughters of U.S. Citizens: 23,400 plus any numbers not required for fourth preference.</p>
<p>Second: Spouses and Children, and Unmarried Sons and Daughters of Permanent Residents: 114,200, plus the number (if any) by which the worldwide family preference level exceeds 226,000, plus any unused first preference numbers:</p>
<p>A. (F2A) Spouses and Children of Permanent Residents: 77% of the overall second preference limitation, of which 75% are exempt from the per-country limit;</p>
<p>B. (F2B) Unmarried Sons and Daughters (21 years of age or older) of Permanent Residents: 23% of the overall second preference limitation.</p>
<p>Third (F3): Married Sons and Daughters of U.S. Citizens: 23,400, plus any numbers not required by first and second preferences.</p>
<p>Fourth (F4): Brothers and Sisters of Adult U.S. Citizens: 65,000, plus any numbers not required by first three preferences.</p>
<p>On the chart below, the listing of a date for any class indicates that the class is oversubscribed (see paragraph 1); &#8220;C&#8221; means current, i.e., numbers are available for all qualified applicants; and &#8220;U&#8221; means unavailable, i.e., no numbers are available. (NOTE: Numbers are available only for applicants whose priority date is earlier than the cut-off date listed below.)</p>
<p>Family-<br />
Sponsored</p>
<p>All Chargeability<br />
Areas Except<br />
Those Listed</p>
<p>CHINA-<br />
mainland born</p>
<p>INDIA</p>
<p>MEXICO</p>
<p>PHILIPPINES</p>
<p>F1</p>
<p>01MAY04</p>
<p>01MAY04</p>
<p>01MAY04</p>
<p>01MAR93</p>
<p>22FEB96</p>
<p>F2A</p>
<p>22AUG07</p>
<p>22AUG07</p>
<p>22AUG07</p>
<p>22JUL07</p>
<p>22AUG07</p>
<p>F2B</p>
<p>15APR03</p>
<p>15APR03</p>
<p>15APR03</p>
<p>22AUG92</p>
<p>08JUN00</p>
<p>F3</p>
<p>01JUN01</p>
<p>01JUN01</p>
<p>01JUN01</p>
<p>15NOV92</p>
<p>08MAR92</p>
<p>F4</p>
<p>08MAR00</p>
<p>08MAR00</p>
<p>08MAR00</p>
<p>15FEB96</p>
<p>01MAY88</p>
<p>*NOTE: For June, F2A numbers EXEMPT from per-country limit are available to applicants from all countries with priority dates earlier than 22JUL07. F2A numbers SUBJECT to per-country limit are available to applicants chargeable to all countries EXCEPT MEXICO with priority dates beginning 22JUL07 and earlier than 22AUG07. (All F2A numbers provided for MEXICO are exempt from the per-country limit; there are no F2A numbers for MEXICO subject to per-country limit.)</p>
<p>5. Section 203(b) of the INA prescribes preference classes for allotment of Employment-based immigrant visas as follows:</p>
<p>EMPLOYMENT-BASED PREFERENCES</p>
<p>First: Priority Workers: 28.6% of the worldwide employment-based preference level, plus any numbers not required for fourth and fifth preferences.</p>
<p>Second: Members of the Professions Holding Advanced Degrees or Persons of Exceptional Ability: 28.6% of the worldwide employment-based preference level, plus any numbers not required by first preference.</p>
<p>Third: Skilled Workers, Professionals, and Other Workers: 28.6% of the worldwide level, plus any numbers not required by first and second preferences, not more than 10,000 of which to &#8220;*Other Workers&#8221;.</p>
<p>Fourth: Certain Special Immigrants: 7.1% of the worldwide level.</p>
<p>Fifth: Employment Creation: 7.1% of the worldwide level, not less than 3,000 of which reserved for investors in a targeted rural or high-unemployment area, and 3,000 set aside for investors in regional centers by Sec. 610 of P.L. 102-395.</p>
<p>On the chart below, the listing of a date for any class indicates that the class is oversubscribed (see paragraph 1); &#8220;C&#8221; means current, i.e., numbers are available for all qualified applicants; and &#8220;U&#8221; means unavailable, i.e., no numbers are available. (NOTE: Numbers are available only for applicants whose priority date is earlier than the cut-off date listed below.)</p>
<p>Employment-<br />
Based</p>
<p>All Chargeability Areas Except Those Listed</p>
<p>CHINA-<br />
mainland born</p>
<p>INDIA</p>
<p>MEXICO</p>
<p>PHILIPPINES</p>
<p>1st</p>
<p>C</p>
<p>C</p>
<p>C</p>
<p>C</p>
<p>C</p>
<p>2nd</p>
<p>C</p>
<p>15OCT06</p>
<p>15OCT06</p>
<p>C</p>
<p>C</p>
<p>3rd</p>
<p>15SEP05</p>
<p>15MAY04</p>
<p>22APR02</p>
<p>22DEC04</p>
<p>15SEP05</p>
<p>Other Workers</p>
<p>08NOV03</p>
<p>22APR03</p>
<p>22APR02</p>
<p>08NOV03</p>
<p>08NOV03</p>
<p>4th</p>
<p>C</p>
<p>C</p>
<p>C</p>
<p>C</p>
<p>C</p>
<p>Certain Religious Workers</p>
<p>C</p>
<p>C</p>
<p>C</p>
<p>C</p>
<p>C</p>
<p>5th<br />
Targeted Employment Areas/ Regional Centers and Pilot Programs</p>
<p>C</p>
<p>C</p>
<p>C</p>
<p>C</p>
<p>C</p>
<p>*Employment Third Preference Other Workers Category: Section 203(e) of the Nicaraguan and Central American Relief Act (NACARA) passed by Congress in November 1997, as amended by Section 1(e) of Pub. L. 105-139, provides that once the Employment Third Preference Other Worker (EW) cut-off date has reached the priority date of the latest EW petition approved prior to November 19, 1997, the 10,000 EW numbers available for a fiscal year are to be reduced by up to 5,000 annually beginning in the following fiscal year. This reduction is to be made for as long as necessary to offset adjustments under the NACARA program. Since the EW cut-off date reached November 19, 1997 during Fiscal Year 2001, the reduction in the EW annual limit to 5,000 began in Fiscal Year 2002.</p>
<p>6. The Department of State has a recorded message with visa availability information which can be heard at: (202) 663-1541. This recording is updated on or about the tenth of each month with information on cut-off dates for the following month.<br />
2. DIVERSITY IMMIGRANT (DV) CATEGORY</p>
<p>Section 203(c) of the INA provides up to 55,000 immigrant visas each fiscal year to permit additional immigration opportunities for persons from countries with low admissions during the previous five years. The NACARA stipulates that beginning with DV-99, and for as long as necessary, up to 5,000 of the 55,000 annually-allocated diversity visas will be made available for use under the NACARA program. This resulted in reduction of the DV-2011 annual limit to 50,000. DV visas are divided among six geographic regions. No one country can receive more than seven percent of the available diversity visas in any one year.</p>
<p>For June, immigrant numbers in the DV category are available to qualified DV-2011 applicants chargeable to all regions/eligible countries as follows. When an allocation cut-off number is shown, visas are available only for applicants with DV regional lottery rank numbers BELOW the specified allocation cut-off number:</p>
<p>Region</p>
<p>All DV Chargeability<br />
Areas Except Those Listed Separately</p>
<p>AFRICA</p>
<p>49,300</p>
<p>Except: Egypt 34,300<br />
Ethiopia 28,525<br />
Nigeria 17,150</p>
<p>ASIA</p>
<p>28,600</p>
<p>EUROPE</p>
<p>29,450</p>
<p>Except: Uzbekistan 27,800</p>
<p>NORTH AMERICA<br />
(BAHAMAS)</p>
<p>12</p>
<p>OCEANIA</p>
<p>1,300</p>
<p>SOUTH AMERICA,<br />
and the CARIBBEAN</p>
<p>1,300</p>
<p>Entitlement to immigrant status in the DV category lasts only through the end of the fiscal (visa) year for which the applicant is selected in the lottery. The year of entitlement for all applicants registered for the DV-2011 program ends as of September 30, 2011. DV visas may not be issued to DV-2011 applicants after that date. Similarly, spouses and children accompanying or following to join DV-2011 principals are only entitled to derivative DV status until September 30, 2011. DV visa availability through the very end of FY-2011 cannot be taken for granted. Numbers could be exhausted prior to September 30.<br />
3. ADVANCE NOTIFICATION OF THE DIVERSITY (DV) IMMIGRANT CATEGORY RANK CUT-OFFS WHICH WILL APPLY IN JULY</p>
<p>For July, immigrant numbers in the DV category are available to qualified DV-2011 applicants chargeable to all regions/eligible countries as follows. When an allocation cut-off number is shown, visas are available only for applicants with DV regional lottery rank numbers BELOW the specified allocation cut-off number:</p>
<p>Region</p>
<p>All DV Chargeability<br />
Areas Except Those Listed Separately</p>
<p>AFRICA</p>
<p>57,600</p>
<p>Except: Egypt 35,000<br />
Ethiopia 30,650<br />
Nigeria 18,500</p>
<p>ASIA</p>
<p>33,775</p>
<p>EUROPE</p>
<p>33,000</p>
<p>Except: Uzbekistan 28,200</p>
<p>NORTH AMERICA<br />
(BAHAMAS)</p>
<p>12</p>
<p>OCEANIA</p>
<p>1,400</p>
<p>SOUTH AMERICA,<br />
and the CARIBBEAN</p>
<p>1,400</p>
<p>4. VISA AVAILABILITY IN THE EMPLOYMENT SECOND PREFERENCE CATEGORY</p>
<p>As mentioned in the May Visa Bulletin, Section 202(a)(5) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) prescribes rules for the use of potentially “otherwise unused” Employment numbers. During May the India Employment Second preference cut-off date is governing the use of such numbers, because India had reached its Employment Second annual limit.</p>
<p>Since October there has been heavy demand by applicants &#8220;upgrading&#8221; their status from Employment Third to Employment Second preference. The rapid forward movement of the India Employment Second preference cut-off date in May had the potential to greatly increase such demand. Therefore, the determination of the June cut-off dates was delayed in order to monitor this demand. At this time the amount of new &#8220;upgrade&#8221; demand has been minimal; this has allowed the Employment Second preference cut-off date governing the use of the Section 202(a)(5) numbers to advance significantly for June. The same cut-off date will apply to both China and India Employment Second preference. Note that under INA Section 203(e) all of the “otherwise unused” numbers must be provided strictly in priority date order regardless of the applicant’s chargeability.</p>
<p>Cut-off date movement for upcoming months cannot be guaranteed, and because of the variables involved, no assumptions should be made until the dates are formally announced. Should there be a sudden or significant increase in India and China Employment Second preference demand it may be necessary to slow, stop, or retrogress that cut-off date as we approach the end of fiscal year 2011.</p>
<br />  <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gocomments/theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/341/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/comments/theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/341/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godelicious/theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/341/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/delicious/theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/341/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gofacebook/theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/341/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/facebook/theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/341/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gotwitter/theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/341/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/twitter/theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/341/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gostumble/theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/341/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/stumble/theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/341/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godigg/theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/341/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/digg/theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/341/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/goreddit/theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/341/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/reddit/theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/341/" /></a> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com&amp;blog=6520816&amp;post=341&amp;subd=theimmigrationlawjournal&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/2011/07/05/visa-bulletin-for-june-2011/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/7489bcbd1141f62e3971d4d095a39545?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">theimmigrationlawjournal</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>6 young illegal immigrants arrested in Ga. protest</title>
		<link>http://theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/2011/07/04/6-young-illegal-immigrants-arrested-in-ga-protest/</link>
		<comments>http://theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/2011/07/04/6-young-illegal-immigrants-arrested-in-ga-protest/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2011 22:20:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>theimmigrationlawjournal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Comprehensive Immigration Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deportation and Removal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICE:  Immigration Customs Enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration News Stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Immigration Law Journal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/?p=344</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ATLANTA—Six young illegal immigrants were arrested Tuesday after they sat down and blocked traffic near the Georgia state Capitol to publicly declare their status and to protest state policies targeting people who are in the U.S. illegally, the latest in a string of such "coming out" events in Georgia and other parts of the country.

The young people were protesting a policy that bars Georgia's most competitive state colleges and universities from accepting illegal immigrants and they were opposing strict new state legislation. A federal judge on Monday blocked two key provisions of that law. The young people, who decided to risk arrest and deportation for their protest, say that's not enough.

Federal judges have now blocked parts of similar laws in Arizona, Utah, Indiana and Georgia from taking effect. Civil liberties groups have pledged to sue to block others in Alabama and South Carolina.

"It's time to stand up and let the world know that we need to fight for what we believe in," said Nataly Ibarra, a 16-year-old high school student.

Four of the young people arrested are high school students, one is a recent high school graduate and one is a 24-year-old college graduate. All six face charges of reckless conduct, obstructing law enforcement and obstructing the street. The three who are under 18 were to be released to their parents. Two 18-year-olds and the 24-year-old were set to be taken to the Fulton County Jail.

<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com&amp;blog=6520816&amp;post=344&amp;subd=theimmigrationlawjournal&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By Kate Brumback</p>
<p>Associated Press / June 29, 2011</p>
<div>
<p>ATLANTA—Six young illegal immigrants were arrested Tuesday after they sat down and blocked traffic near the Georgia state Capitol to publicly declare their status and to protest state policies targeting people who are in the U.S. illegally, the latest in a string of such &#8220;coming out&#8221; events in Georgia and other parts of the country.</p>
<p>The young people were protesting a policy that bars Georgia&#8217;s most competitive state colleges and universities from accepting illegal immigrants and they were opposing strict new state legislation. A federal judge on Monday blocked two key provisions of that law. The young people, who decided to risk arrest and deportation for their protest, say that&#8217;s not enough.</p>
<div>
<p>Federal judges have now blocked parts of similar laws in Arizona, Utah, Indiana and Georgia from taking effect. Civil liberties groups have pledged to sue to block others in Alabama and South Carolina.</p>
</div>
<div>
<p>&#8220;It&#8217;s time to stand up and let the world know that we need to fight for what we believe in,&#8221; said Nataly Ibarra, a 16-year-old high school student.</p>
</div>
<div>
<p>Four of the young people arrested are high school students, one is a recent high school graduate and one is a 24-year-old college graduate. All six face charges of reckless conduct, obstructing law enforcement and obstructing the street. The three who are under 18 were to be released to their parents. Two 18-year-olds and the 24-year-old were set to be taken to the Fulton County Jail.</p>
</div>
<div>
<p>Barbara Gonzalez, press secretary for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, issued a statement after the arrests: &#8220;ICE takes enforcement action on a case by case basis &#8212; prioritizing those who present the most significant threats to public safety as determined by their criminal history and taking into consideration the specific facts of each case, including immigration history.&#8221;</p>
</div>
<div>
<p>Last year, four young people were arrested during a sit-in at U.S. Sen. John McCain&#8217;s office in Arizona. Students at several suburban Atlanta high schools staged walkouts last month, and a group of seven illegal immigrant young people were arrested in April after they sat down in a downtown Atlanta street and blocked traffic to call attention to their situation. Five others were arrested in May at the Indiana office of Gov. Mitch Daniels after a protest grew confrontational.</p>
</div>
<div>
<p>Many of the activists hold out hope for the DREAM Act, legislation that would provide a path to legalization for certain young people brought to the U.S. illegally by their parents. The bill has been introduced several times in Congress without success. A Senate subcommittee held a hearing on the legislation Tuesday.</p>
</div>
<div>
<p>Several dozen students in their caps and gowns attended the hearing, despite their status as illegal immigrants. Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., introduced several who had demonstrated excellence in many facets of life but were unable to get jobs in their chosen fields.</p>
<div>
<p>&#8220;They want to serve the country they love,&#8221; Durbin said. &#8220;All they want is a chance.&#8221;</p>
<p>Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, said lawmakers from both parties have compassion for the students who would be helped by the legislation, but he said the details are important. He pointed to changes that he believes are necessary for the bill before it can gain more Republican support.</p>
<div>
<p>Opponents of the DREAM Act often agree that young people brought here when they&#8217;re young have compelling stories. But giving them a path to legalization could create increased competition for young Americans who already are having trouble finding jobs, they say.</p>
</div>
<div>
<p>The Georgia university system last fall adopted a policy barring state colleges and universities that have rejected academically qualified students in the prior two years from accepting illegal immigrants.</p>
</div>
<div>
<p>Judge Thomas Thrash on Monday ruled on a request by civil liberties groups to block Georgia&#8217;s new illegal immigration law from taking effect until a lawsuit challenging its constitutionality is resolved. Thrash temporarily blocked a provision that authorizes police to check the immigration status of suspects without proper identification and to detain illegal immigrants and another that penalizes people who knowingly and willingly transport or harbor illegal immigrants while committing another crime.</p>
</div>
<div>
<p>The law&#8217;s author, state Rep. Matt Ramsey, R-Peachtree City, has said it&#8217;s needed to keep illegal immigrants from draining the state&#8217;s resources.</p>
</div>
<div>
<p>Many parts of the law will take effect Friday. One of them makes it a felony to use false information or documentation when applying for a job. Another creates an immigration review board to investigate complaints about government officials not complying with state laws related to illegal immigration.</p>
</div>
<div>
<p>Starting Jan. 1, businesses with 500 or more employees must use a federal database to check the immigration status of new hires. That requirement will be phased in for all businesses with more than 10 employees by July 2013. Also starting Jan. 1, applicants for public benefits must provide at least one state or federally issued &#8220;secure and verifiable&#8221; document.</p>
</div>
<div>
<p>Also on Tuesday, the Birmingham, Ala., City Council unanimously approved a resolution seeking the repeal of Alabama&#8217;s new law targeting illegal immigration, with members calling it a hateful reminder of the state&#8217;s not-too-distant past as a bastion of legalized racial segregation.</p>
</div>
<div>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;</p>
</div>
<div>
<p>Associated Press Writer Kevin Freking in Washington, D.C., contributed to this story</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<br />  <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gocomments/theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/344/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/comments/theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/344/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godelicious/theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/344/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/delicious/theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/344/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gofacebook/theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/344/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/facebook/theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/344/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gotwitter/theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/344/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/twitter/theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/344/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gostumble/theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/344/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/stumble/theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/344/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godigg/theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/344/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/digg/theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/344/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/goreddit/theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/344/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/reddit/theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/344/" /></a> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com&amp;blog=6520816&amp;post=344&amp;subd=theimmigrationlawjournal&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/2011/07/04/6-young-illegal-immigrants-arrested-in-ga-protest/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/7489bcbd1141f62e3971d4d095a39545?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">theimmigrationlawjournal</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>It Gets Even Worse</title>
		<link>http://theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/2011/07/04/it-gets-even-worse/</link>
		<comments>http://theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/2011/07/04/it-gets-even-worse/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2011 22:01:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>theimmigrationlawjournal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Border Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comprehensive Immigration Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deportation and Removal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICE:  Immigration Customs Enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration News Stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Immigration Law Journal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/?p=315</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you thought the do-it-yourself anti-immigrant schemes couldn’t get any more repellent, you were wrong. New laws in Georgia, Alabama and South Carolina are following — and in some ways outdoing — Arizona’s attempt to engineer the mass expulsion of the undocumented, no matter the damage to the Constitution, public safety, local economies and immigrant families.

The laws vary in their details but share a common strategy: to make it impossible for people without papers to live without fear.

<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com&amp;blog=6520816&amp;post=315&amp;subd=theimmigrationlawjournal&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New York Times &#8211; Editorial &#8211; July 3, 2011</p>
<p>If you thought the do-it-yourself anti-immigrant schemes couldn’t get any more repellent, you were wrong. New laws in Georgia, Alabama and South Carolina are following — and in some ways outdoing — Arizona’s attempt to engineer the mass expulsion of the undocumented, no matter the damage to the Constitution, public safety, local economies and immigrant families.</p>
<p>The laws vary in their details but share a common strategy: to make it impossible for people without papers to live without fear.</p>
<p>They give new powers to local police untrained in immigration law. They force businesses to purge work forces and schools to check students’ immigration status. And they greatly increase the danger of unreasonable searches, false arrests, racial profiling and other abuses, not just against immigrants, but anyone who may look like some officer’s idea of an illegal immigrant.</p>
<p>The laws empower local police officers to demand the documents of people they meet, and to detain those they suspect are here illegally. That means they can make warrantless arrests for assumed civil immigration violations, a stunning abuse of power.</p>
<p>The laws also make it illegal to give a ride to the undocumented, so a son could land in jail for driving his mother to the supermarket, or a church volunteer for ferrying families to a soup kitchen. They require businesses to check employees against the error-plagued federal E-Verify database, and to fire those who are flagged as unauthorized. Once the purge takes hold in agriculture, there will be no one left to pick onions, peaches and cotton. The immigrant labor shortage is already being felt in Georgia, where crops are rotting and the governor has called for using jobless ex-convicts in the fields.</p>
<p>Alabama’s law is the most extreme. It forces public school districts to determine the immigration status of students and their parents and report the data to the state. Alabama still can’t bar them from enrolling, since the Supreme Court declared in Plyler v. Doe that all children are entitled to a public education. The state’s law seems designed to challenge that ruling, as it turns school officials into de facto immigration agents and impels frightened parents to keep their children home.</p>
<p>It has long been clear that America is suffering for lack of a well-functioning immigration system that better protects workers and families, promotes lawfulness at the border and in the workplace, and gives hardworking people a path to legality.</p>
<p>Congress’s inaction has let the states run amok with their own destructive ideas. Supporters insist they are only trying to enforce the law. But trying to catch and deport 11 million people is lunacy. The damage to this country — its citizens and its laws — is enormous.</p>
<p>Civil rights organizations are suing or threatening to sue to block these noxious state laws. So far federal courts have enjoined parts of bad local laws in Arizona, Georgia, Utah and Indiana. President Obama’s Department of Justice has sued Arizona but not the other states. It needs to fight harder.</p>
<br />  <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gocomments/theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/315/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/comments/theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/315/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godelicious/theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/315/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/delicious/theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/315/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gofacebook/theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/315/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/facebook/theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/315/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gotwitter/theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/315/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/twitter/theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/315/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gostumble/theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/315/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/stumble/theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/315/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godigg/theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/315/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/digg/theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/315/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/goreddit/theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/315/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/reddit/theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/315/" /></a> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com&amp;blog=6520816&amp;post=315&amp;subd=theimmigrationlawjournal&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/2011/07/04/it-gets-even-worse/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/7489bcbd1141f62e3971d4d095a39545?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">theimmigrationlawjournal</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Visa Bulletin For May 2011l</title>
		<link>http://theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/2011/04/22/visa-bulletin-for-may-2011l/</link>
		<comments>http://theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/2011/04/22/visa-bulletin-for-may-2011l/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2011 04:43:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>theimmigrationlawjournal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Employment Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration Updates from USCIS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Immigration Law Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Visa Bulletin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/?p=338</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[1.  This bulletin summarizes the availability of immigrant numbers during May. Consular officers are required to report to the Department of State documentarily qualified applicants for numerically limited visas; the Bureau of Citizenship and Immigration Services in the Department of Homeland Security reports applicants for adjustment of status.  Allocations were made, to the extent possible under the numerical limitations, for the demand received by April 8th in the chronological order of the reported priority dates. If the demand could not be satisfied within the statutory or regulatory limits, the category or foreign state in which demand was excessive was deemed oversubscribed.  The cut-off date for an oversubscribed category is the priority date of the first applicant who could not be reached within the numerical limits.  Only applicants who have a priority date earlier than the cut-off date may be allotted a number.  Immediately that it becomes necessary during the monthly allocation process to retrogress a cut-off date, supplemental requests for numbers will be honored only if the priority date falls within the new cut-off date which has been announced in this bulletin.

2. Section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) sets an annual minimum family-sponsored preference limit of 226,000.  The worldwide level for annual employment-based preference immigrants is at least 140,000.  Section 202 prescribes that the per-country limit for preference immigrants is set at 7% of the total annual family-sponsored and employment-based preference limits, i.e., 25,620.  The dependent area limit is set at 2%, or 7,320.<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com&amp;blog=6520816&amp;post=338&amp;subd=theimmigrationlawjournal&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Number 32<br />Volume IX<br />Washington, D.C.</em></p>
<div id="ContentBody">
<p><strong>A. STATUTORY NUMBERS</strong></p>
<p>1.  This bulletin summarizes the availability of immigrant numbers during <strong>May</strong>. Consular officers are required to report to the Department of State documentarily qualified applicants for numerically limited visas; the Bureau of Citizenship and Immigration Services in the Department of Homeland Security reports applicants for adjustment of status.  Allocations were made, to the extent possible under the numerical limitations, for the demand received by April <strong>8th</strong> in the chronological order of the reported priority dates. If the demand could not be satisfied within the statutory or regulatory limits, the category or foreign state in which demand was excessive was deemed oversubscribed.  The cut-off date for an oversubscribed category is the priority date of the first applicant who could not be reached within the numerical limits.  Only applicants who have a priority date <strong>earlier than</strong> the cut-off date may be allotted a number.  Immediately that it becomes necessary during the monthly allocation process to retrogress a cut-off date, supplemental requests for numbers will be honored only if the priority date falls within the new cut-off date which has been announced in this bulletin.</p>
<p>2. Section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) sets an annual minimum family-sponsored preference limit of 226,000.  The worldwide level for annual employment-based preference immigrants is at least 140,000.  Section 202 prescribes that the per-country limit for preference immigrants is set at 7% of the total annual family-sponsored and employment-based preference limits, i.e., 25,620.  The dependent area limit is set at 2%, or 7,320.</p>
<p>3.  INA Section 203(e) provides that family-sponsored and employment-based preference visas be issued to eligible immigrants in the order in which a petition in behalf of each has been filed.  Section 203(d) provides that spouses and children of preference immigrants are entitled to the same status, and the same order of consideration, if accompanying or following to join the principal.  The visa prorating provisions of Section 202(e) apply to allocations for a foreign state or dependent area when visa demand exceeds the per-country limit.  These provisions apply at present to the following oversubscribed chargeability areas:  CHINA-mainland born, INDIA, MEXICO, and PHILIPPINES.</p>
<p>4.  Section 203 of the INA prescribes preference classes for allotment of immigrant visas as follows:</p>
<p><strong>FAMILY-SPONSORED PREFERENCES</strong></p>
<p><strong>First</strong>: <strong>(F1)</strong> Unmarried Sons and Daughters of Citizens: 23,400 plus any numbers not required for fourth preference.</p>
<p><strong>Second</strong>: Spouses and Children, and Unmarried Sons and Daughters of Permanent Residents: 114,200, plus the number (if any) by which the worldwide family preference level exceeds 226,000, and any unused first preference numbers:</p>
<p>A. <strong>(F2A)</strong> Spouses and Children: 77% of the overall second preference limitation, of which 75% are exempt from the per-country limit;</p>
<p>B. <strong>(F2B)</strong> Unmarried Sons and Daughters (21 years of age or older): 23% of the overall second preference limitation.</p>
<p><strong>Third</strong>: <strong>(F3)</strong> Married Sons and Daughters of Citizens: 23,400, plus any numbers not required by first and second preferences.</p>
<p><strong>Fourth</strong>: <strong>(F4)</strong> Brothers and Sisters of Adult Citizens:  65,000, plus any numbers not required by first three preferences.</p>
<p><strong>EMPLOYMENT-BASED PREFERENCES</strong></p>
<p><strong>First</strong>: Priority Workers: 28.6% of the worldwide employment-based preference level, plus any numbers not required for fourth and fifth preferences.</p>
<p><strong>Second</strong>: Members of the Professions Holding Advanced Degrees or Persons of Exceptional Ability: 28.6% of the worldwide employment-based preference level, plus any numbers not required by first preference.</p>
<p><strong>Third</strong>: Skilled Workers, Professionals, and Other Workers: 28.6% of the worldwide level, plus any numbers not required by first and second preferences, not more than 10,000 of which to &#8220;*Other Workers&#8221;.</p>
<p><strong>Fourth</strong>: Certain Special Immigrants: 7.1% of the worldwide level.</p>
<p><strong>Fifth</strong>: Employment Creation: 7.1% of the worldwide level, not less than 3,000 of which reserved for investors in a targeted rural or high-unemployment area, and 3,000 set aside for investors in regional centers by Sec. 610 of P.L. 102-395.</p>
<p>*Employment Third Preference Other Workers Category:  Section 203(e) of the NACARA, as amended by Section 1(e) of Pub. L. 105-139, provides that once the Employment Third Preference Other Worker (EW) cut-off date has reached the priority date of the latest EW petition approved prior to November 19, 1997, the 10,000 EW numbers available for a fiscal year are to be reduced by up to 5,000 annually beginning in the following fiscal year.  This reduction is to be made for as long as necessary to offset adjustments under the NACARA program.  Since the EW cut-off date reached November 19, 1997 during Fiscal Year 2001, the reduction in the EW annual limit to 5,000 began in Fiscal Year 2002.</p>
<p>5. On the charts below, the listing of a date for any class indicates that the class is oversubscribed (see paragraph 1); &#8220;C&#8221; means current, i.e., numbers are available for all qualified applicants; and &#8220;U&#8221; means unavailable, i.e., no numbers are available.  (NOTE:  Numbers are available only for applicants whose priority date is <strong>earlier</strong> than the cut-off date listed below.)</p>
<table width="424" border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="2">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><strong>Family- Sponsored</strong></td>
<td><strong>All Chargeability Areas Except Those Listed</strong></td>
<td><strong>CHINA-mainland born</strong></td>
<td><strong>INDIA</strong></td>
<td><strong>MEXICO</strong></td>
<td><strong>PHILIPPINES</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>F1</td>
<td>01MAY04</td>
<td>01MAY04</td>
<td>01MAY04</td>
<td>01MAR93</td>
<td>15JUL95</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>F2A</td>
<td>08JUN07</td>
<td>08JUN07</td>
<td>08JUN07</td>
<td>01JAN07</td>
<td>08JUN07</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>F2B</td>
<td>15APR03</td>
<td>15APR03</td>
<td>15APR03</td>
<td>01AUG92</td>
<td>01MAR00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>F3</td>
<td>01MAY01</td>
<td>01MAY01</td>
<td>01MAY01</td>
<td>15NOV92</td>
<td>15FEB92</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>F4</td>
<td>08MAR00</td>
<td>22JAN00</td>
<td>08MAR00</td>
<td>15FEB96</td>
<td>08APR88</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>*NOTE:  For May, F2A numbers <strong>EXEMPT from per-country limit</strong> are available to applicants from all countries with priority dates <strong>earlier</strong> than 01JAN07.  F2A numbers <strong>SUBJECT to per-country limit</strong> are available to applicants chargeable to all countries <strong>EXCEPT MEXICO</strong> with priority dates beginning 01JAN07 and earlier than 08JUN07.  (All F2A numbers provided for MEXICO are exempt from the per-country limit; there are no F2A numbers for MEXICO subject to per-country limit.)</p>
<table width="424" border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="2">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><strong>Employment- Based</strong></td>
<td><strong>All Chargeability Areas Except Those Listed</strong></td>
<td><strong>CHINA- mainland born</strong></td>
<td><strong>INDIA</strong></td>
<td><strong>MEXICO</strong></td>
<td><strong>PHILIPPINES</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td height="20">1st</td>
<td>C</td>
<td>C</td>
<td>C</td>
<td>C</td>
<td>C</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2nd</td>
<td width="71" height="20">C</td>
<td width="71">01AUG06</td>
<td width="64">01JUL06</td>
<td width="64">C</td>
<td width="71">C</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>3rd</td>
<td height="20">22AUG05</td>
<td>15APR04</td>
<td>15APR02</td>
<td>08SEP04</td>
<td>22AUG05</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Other Workers</td>
<td height="20">08SEP03</td>
<td>22APR03</td>
<td>15APR02</td>
<td>08SEP03</td>
<td>08SEP03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>4th</td>
<td>C</td>
<td>C</td>
<td>C</td>
<td>C</td>
<td>C</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Certain Religious Workers</td>
<td>C</td>
<td>C</td>
<td>C</td>
<td>C</td>
<td>C</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>5th<br />
Targeted Employment Areas/ Regional Centers and Private Programs</td>
<td>C</td>
<td>C</td>
<td>C</td>
<td>C</td>
<td>C</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>The Department of State has available a recorded message with visa availability information which can be heard at: (area code 202) 663-1541. This recording will be updated in the middle of each month with information on cut-off dates for the following month.</p>
<p><strong>B. DIVERSITY IMMIGRANT (DV) CATEGORY</strong></p>
<p>Section 203(c) of the Immigration and Nationality Act provides a maximum of up to 55,000 immigrant visas each fiscal year to permit immigration opportunities for persons from countries other than the principal sources of current immigration to the United States.  The Nicaraguan and Central American Relief Act (NACARA) passed by Congress in November 1997 stipulates that beginning with DV-99, and for as long as necessary, up to 5,000 of the 55,000 annually-allocated diversity visas will be made available for use under the NACARA program.  <strong>This reduction has resulted in the DV-2011 annual limit being reduced to 50,000</strong>.  DV visas are divided among six geographic regions.  No one country can receive more than seven percent of the available diversity visas in any one year.</p>
<p>For <strong>May</strong>, immigrant numbers in the DV category are available to qualified DV-2011 applicants chargeable to all regions/eligible countries as follows. When an allocation cut-off number is shown, visas are available only for applicants with DV regional lottery rank numbers <strong>BELOW</strong> the specified allocation cut-off number:</p>
<table summary="This table shows the priority dates for employment based immigrant visas." width="591" border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="2">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th width="204">Region</th>
<th scope="col" width="100">All DV Chargeability Areas Except Those Listed Separately</th>
<th scope="col" width="147"></th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td scope="col"><strong>AFRICA</strong></td>
<td>42,000</td>
<td>Except: Egypt 31,200<br />
Ethiopia 26,200<br />
Nigeria 15,450</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td scope="row"><strong>ASIA</strong></td>
<td>23,500</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td scope="row"><strong>EUROPE</strong></td>
<td>27,800</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td scope="row"><strong>NORTH AMERICA (BAHAMAS)</strong></td>
<td>12</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td scope="row"><strong>OCEANIA</strong></td>
<td>1,175</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td scope="row"><strong>SOUTH AMERICA, and the CARIBBEAN</strong></td>
<td>1,150</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><strong>C. ADVANCE NOTIFICATION OF THE DIVERSITY (DV) IMMIGRANT CATEGORY RANK CUT-OFFS WHICH WILL APPLY IN JUNE</strong></p>
<p>For <strong>June</strong>, immigrant numbers in the DV category are available to qualified DV-2011 applicants chargeable to all regions/eligible countries as follows. When an allocation cut-off number is shown, visas are available only for applicants with DV regional lottery rank numbers <strong>BELOW</strong> the specified allocation cut-off number:</p>
<table summary="This table shows the priority dates for employment based immigrant visas." width="520" border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="2">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th width="243">Region</th>
<th scope="col" width="98">All DV Chargeability Areas Except Those Listed Separately</th>
<th scope="col" width="159"></th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td scope="col"><strong>AFRICA</strong></td>
<td>49,300</td>
<td>Except: Egypt 34,300<br />
Ethiopia 28,525<br />
Nigeria 17,150</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td scope="row"><strong>ASIA</strong></td>
<td>28,600</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td scope="row"><strong>EUROPE</strong></td>
<td>29,450</td>
<td>Except:<br />
Uzbekistan  27,800</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td scope="row"><strong>NORTH AMERICA (BAHAMAS)</strong></td>
<td>12</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td scope="row"><strong>OCEANIA</strong></td>
<td>1,300</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td scope="row"><strong>SOUTH AMERICA, and the CARIBBEAN</strong></td>
<td>1,300</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Entitlement to immigrant status in the DV category lasts only through the end of the fiscal (visa) year for which the applicant is selected in the lottery. The year of entitlement for all applicants registered for the DV-2011 program ends as of September 30, 2011. DV visas may not be issued to DV-2011 applicants after that date. Similarly, spouses and children accompanying or following to join DV-2011 principals are only entitled to derivative DV status until September 30, 2011. DV visa availability through the very end of FY-2011 cannot be taken for granted. Numbers could be exhausted prior to September 30.</p>
<p><strong>D. VISA AVAILABILITY DURING THE COMING MONTHS</strong></p>
<p><strong>Family-sponsored</strong>:  The extremely high level of demand during the first few months of FY-2011 resulted in the retrogression of most worldwide cut-off dates in January or February.  Most of these cut-offs have begun to advance slowly, although demand is still somewhat heavy in the Family First preference which may require further retrogression of that date.  At this time it is not possible to predict the rate of forward movement, but some movement is anticipated in most categories for the remainder of the fiscal year.</p>
<p><strong>Employment-based</strong>:  At this time the amount of demand being received in the Employment First preference is extremely low compared with that of recent years.  Absent an immediate and dramatic increase in demand, this category will remain “Current” for all countries.  It also appears unlikely that a Second preference cut-off date will be imposed for any countries other than China and India, where demand is extremely high.  Based on current indications of demand, the best case scenarios for cut-off date movement each month during the coming months are as follows:</p>
<p><strong>Employment Second</strong>:  Demand by applicants who are “upgrading” their status from Employment Third to Employment Second preference is very high, but the exact amount is not known.  Such “upgrades” are in addition to the known demand already reported, and make it very difficult to predict ultimate demand based on forward movement of the China and India cut-off dates.  While thousands of “otherwise unused” numbers will be available for potential use without regard to the China and India Employment Second preference per-country annual limits, it is not known how the “upgrades” will ultimately impact the cut-offs for those two countries.  (The allocation of “otherwise unused” numbers is discussed below.)</p>
<p>China: none to three weeks expected through July.  No August or September estimate is possible at this time.</p>
<p>India: One or more weeks, possibly followed by additional movement if demand remains stable.  No August or September estimate is possible at this time.</p>
<p><strong>Employment Third</strong>:</p>
<p>Worldwide: three to six weeks<br />
China: one to three weeks<br />
India: none to two weeks<br />
Mexico: although continued forward movement is expected, no specific projections are possible at this time.<br />
Philippines: three to six weeks</p>
<p>Please be advised that the above ranges are estimates based upon the current demand patterns, and are subject to fluctuations during the coming months. The cut-off dates for upcoming months cannot be guaranteed, and no assumptions should be made until the formal dates are announced.</p>
<p><strong>Allocation of “otherwise unused” numbers in accordance with Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) Section 202(a)(5)</strong></p>
<p>INA Section 202(a)(5) provides that if total demand in a calendar quarter will be insufficient to use all available numbers in an Employment preference, then the unused numbers may be made available without regard to the annual per-country limits.  Based on current levels of demand, there will be otherwise unused numbers in the Employment First and Second preferences.  Such numbers may be allocated without regard to per-country limits, once a country has reached its preference annual limit.  Since under INA Section 203(e) such numbers must be provided strictly in priority date order regardless of chargeability, greater number use by one country would indicate greater demand by applicants from that country with earlier priority dates.  Based on amount and priority dates of pending demand and year-to-date number use, a different cut-off date could be applied to each oversubscribed country, for the purpose of assuring that the maximum amount of available numbers will be used.  Note that a cut-off date imposed to control the use of “otherwise unused” numbers could be earlier than the cut-off date established to control number use under a quarterly or per-country annual limit.  For example, at present the India Employment Second preference cut-off date governs the use of numbers under Section 202(a)(5), India having reached its Employment Second annual limit; the China Employment Second preference cut-off date governs number use under the quarterly limit, since China has not yet reached its Employment Second annual limit.</p>
<p>The rate of number use under Section 202(a)(5) is continually monitored to determine whether subsequent adjustments are needed in visa availability for the oversubscribed countries.  This helps assure that all available Employment preference numbers will be used, while insuring that numbers also remain available for applicants from all other countries that have not yet reached their per-country limit.</p>
<p>As mentioned earlier, the number of applicants who may be “upgrading” their status from Employment Third to Employment Second preference is unknown.  As a result, the cut-off date which governs use of Section 202(a)(5) numbers has been advanced more rapidly than normal, in an attempt to ascertain the amount of “upgrade” demand in the pipeline while at the same time administering use of the available numbers.  This action risks a surge in demand that could adversely impact the cut-off date later in the fiscal year.  However, it also limits the possibility that potential demand would not materialize and the annual limit would not be reached due to lack of cut-off date movement.</p></div>
<br />  <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gocomments/theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/338/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/comments/theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/338/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godelicious/theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/338/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/delicious/theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/338/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gofacebook/theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/338/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/facebook/theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/338/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gotwitter/theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/338/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/twitter/theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/338/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gostumble/theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/338/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/stumble/theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/338/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godigg/theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/338/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/digg/theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/338/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/goreddit/theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/338/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/reddit/theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/338/" /></a> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com&amp;blog=6520816&amp;post=338&amp;subd=theimmigrationlawjournal&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/2011/04/22/visa-bulletin-for-may-2011l/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/7489bcbd1141f62e3971d4d095a39545?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">theimmigrationlawjournal</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Study estimates that Illegal Immigrants paid $11.2B in taxes last year, unlike GE, which paid zero</title>
		<link>http://theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/2011/04/22/study-estimates-that-illegal-immigrants-paid-11-2b-in-taxes-last-year-unlike-ge-which-paid-zero/</link>
		<comments>http://theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/2011/04/22/study-estimates-that-illegal-immigrants-paid-11-2b-in-taxes-last-year-unlike-ge-which-paid-zero/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2011 04:41:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>theimmigrationlawjournal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Comprehensive Immigration Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deportation and Removal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration and Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration News Stories]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/?p=336</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I bet most of you didn't know undocumented immigrants contributed more - much more - to the national treasury last year than General Electric. Surprised? Yet it's true.

While GE - which earned a whopping $14 billion last year - is reported to have paid nothing, nada, zero in taxes (GE denies it), the undocumented paid billions in state and local taxes in 2010.

No, it's not me talking; it's the Institute for Taxation and Economic Policy (itepnet.org), a prestigious, nonprofit, nonpartisan research organization that works on federal, state and local tax policy issues.

Obviously the old saying, "Nothing is certain but death and taxes," is not to be believed anymore. Or rather, only half of it can be believed.

Because death, of course, remains as dreaded and inevitable as ever, but with taxes the story is different.<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com&amp;blog=6520816&amp;post=336&amp;subd=theimmigrationlawjournal&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="/authors/Albor%20Ruiz%20-%20Ny%20Local">Albor Ruiz &#8211; Ny Local</a></p>
<p>Wednesday, April 20th 2011</p>
<p>I bet most of you didn&#8217;t know undocumented immigrants contributed more &#8211; much more &#8211; to the national treasury last year than <a title="General Electric Company" href="http://www.nydailynews.com/topics/General+Electric+Company">General Electric</a>. Surprised? Yet it&#8217;s true.</p>
<p>While GE &#8211; which earned a whopping $14 billion last year &#8211; is reported to have paid nothing, nada, zero in taxes (GE denies it), the undocumented paid billions in state and local taxes in 2010.</p>
<p>No, it&#8217;s not me talking; it&#8217;s the <a title="Institute for Taxation and Economic Policy" href="http://www.nydailynews.com/topics/Institute+for+Taxation+and+Economic+Policy">Institute for Taxation and Economic Policy</a> (itepnet.org), a prestigious, nonprofit, nonpartisan research organization that works on federal, state and local tax policy issues.</p>
<p>Obviously the old saying, &#8220;Nothing is certain but death and taxes,&#8221; is not to be believed anymore. Or rather, only half of it can be believed.</p>
<p>Because death, of course, remains as dreaded and inevitable as ever, but with taxes the story is different.</p>
<p>&#8220;The rich are different from you and me,&#8221; the famous <a title="F. Scott Fitzgerald" href="http://www.nydailynews.com/topics/F.+Scott+Fitzgerald">F. Scott Fitzgerald</a> quote, is a much more accurate description of what&#8217;s going on in the country.</p>
<p>To no one&#8217;s surprise, taxes are still as certain for working people &#8211; and whatever is left of the middle class &#8211; as they ever were. But for, well, GE and other corporate giants, the only certainty is that many found ways to contribute as little to the country&#8217;s coffers as possible.</p>
<p>At the same time, <a title="U.S. Republican Party" href="http://www.nydailynews.com/topics/U.S.+Republican+Party">Republicans</a> in <a title="Washington, DC" href="http://www.nydailynews.com/topics/Washington%2c+DC">Washington</a> are involved in a mighty struggle to protect the tax breaks of the country&#8217;s richest 2%, while happily proposing to cut the most basic social services to Americans who really need them.</p>
<p>Closer to home, Gov. Cuomo has announced the so-called millionaires tax will not be renewed once it expires in December, although since it was established in 2009 it has brought in as much as $5 billion annually.</p>
<p>There is no doubt, when it comes to taxes the rich are really different.</p>
<p>Ironically the vilified undocumented population, among the poorest and most vulnerable in the country, does its part when it comes to taxes.</p>
<p>They pay sales taxes and property taxes &#8211; even if they rent, ITEP said. At least half of them pay income taxes. And, I believe, if they were ever legalized, close to 100% would do the same. &#8220;Add this all up,&#8221; ITEP said, &#8220;and it amounts to billions in revenue to state and local governments.&#8221;</p>
<p>ITEP estimates that households that are headed by undocumented immigrants (which may include members who are U.S. citizens or legal immigrants) paid $11.2 billion in state and local taxes last year. That included $1.2 billion in personal income taxes, $1.6 billion in property taxes and $8.4 billion in sales taxes.</p>
<p><a title="New York" href="http://www.nydailynews.com/topics/New+York">New York</a> is fourth in the country in tax revenue &#8211; $662.4 million &#8211; from households headed by undocumented immigrants, after <a title="California" href="http://www.nydailynews.com/topics/California">California</a>, <a title="Texas" href="http://www.nydailynews.com/topics/Texas">Texas</a> and <a title="Florida" href="http://www.nydailynews.com/topics/Florida">Florida</a>.</p>
<p>&#8220;These figures should be kept in mind as politicians and commentators continue with the seemingly endless debate over what to do with unauthorized immigrants already living in the <a title="United States" href="http://www.nydailynews.com/topics/United+States">United States</a>,&#8221; ITEP wisely advises.</p>
<p>&#8220;[These] immigrants &#8211; and their family members &#8211; are adding value to the U.S. economy; not only as taxpayers, but as workers, consumers and entrepreneurs as well.&#8221;</p>
<p>Enough with those people &#8211; and they are many &#8211; who think they are the only ones paying taxes, and who accuse the undocumented of being &#8220;leeches&#8221; who contribute nothing. How about redirecting their fury to the real leeches, those with enough means and political clout to exploit every single loophole in our tax laws not to pay their fair share?</p>
<br />  <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gocomments/theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/336/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/comments/theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/336/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godelicious/theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/336/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/delicious/theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/336/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gofacebook/theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/336/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/facebook/theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/336/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gotwitter/theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/336/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/twitter/theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/336/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gostumble/theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/336/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/stumble/theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/336/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godigg/theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/336/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/digg/theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/336/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/goreddit/theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/336/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/reddit/theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/336/" /></a> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com&amp;blog=6520816&amp;post=336&amp;subd=theimmigrationlawjournal&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://theimmigrationlawjournal.wordpress.com/2011/04/22/study-estimates-that-illegal-immigrants-paid-11-2b-in-taxes-last-year-unlike-ge-which-paid-zero/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/7489bcbd1141f62e3971d4d095a39545?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">theimmigrationlawjournal</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
